Recommendations on bioanalytical method stability implications of co-administered and co-formulated drugs by Global CRO Council for Bioanalysis (GCC).

An open letter written by the Global CRO Council for Bioanalysis (GCC) describing the GCC survey results on stability data from co-administered and co-formulated drugs was sent to multiple regulatory authorities on 14 December 2011. This letter and further discussions at different GCC meetings led to subsequent recommendations on this topic of widespread interest within the bioanalytical community over the past 2 years.

4th Global CRO Council for Bioanalysis: coadministered drugs stability, EMA/US FDA guidelines, 483s and carryover.

The Global CRO Council for Bioanalysis (GCC) was formed in September 2010. Since then, the representatives of the member companies come together periodically to openly discuss bioanalysis and the regulatory challenges unique to the outsourcing industry. The 4th GCC Closed Forum brought together experts from bioanalytical CROs to share and discuss recent issues in regulated bioanalysis, such as the impact of coadministered drugs on stability, some differences between European Medicines Agency and US FDA bioanalytical guidance documents and lessons learned following recent Untitled Letters.

Confirmatory reanalysis of incurred bioanalytical samples.

Bioanalytical methods used to support the drug development process are validated to ensure that they function in the manner in which they are intended. "Incurred" or study samples can vary in their composition when compared with the standards and quality control samples used to validate the method and analyze these samples. During the 3rd American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists(AAPS)/Food and Drug Administration(FDA) Bioanalytical Workshop, it was suggested that the reproducibility in the analysis of incurred samples be evaluated in addition to the usual prestudy validation activities performed.

Anti-IgE efficacy in murine asthma models is dependent on the method of allergen sensitization.

Background: Murine models used to delineate mechanisms and key mediators of asthma have yielded conflicting results and suggest that the dominant mechanism and mediators required for disease induction differ depending on the model and method of allergen sensitization used.

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine whether the mode of allergen sensitization influenced the role that IgE had in allergen-induced pulmonary eosinophilic inflammation.

Methods: Mice were exposed to dust mite extract in 2 models of allergic inflammation that differed in the method of sensitization.