Designing evaluation forms to facilitate student learning.

Most dental school instructors struggle to develop course evaluation criteria that can effectively be applied as valid and reliable learning instruments. Vague and unreliable learning assessments often lead to increased dissatisfaction among both faculty and students. Students complain about the "lack of faculty calibration," and faculty are often unable to adequately evaluate competence due to the need to provide an overall course grade by the end of the term.

The effect of magnification on student performance in pediatric operative dentistry.

Previous research has shown that accurate student self-evaluation is related to higher quality dental products. Variance in student performance still remains. Enhancement of visual perception could contribute to product improvement.

Using questions to facilitate motor skill acquisition.

For the process of question-guided problem-solving to work successfully, several conditions must exist: 1) presence of valid and reliable criteria for evaluating product (DO) and performance (DP), 2) development of learning resources such as life-sized examples, 3) training sessions in the application of criteria and use of the process for both faculty and students, and 4) faculty commitment to the process. The process helps to establish conditions in which learning occurs. Underlying its structure is the requirement for incorporation of discrimination tasks.