Publications by authors named "P D Lambiase"

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) prediction improves by combining clinical scores with a polygenic risk score (PRS) for AF (AF-PRS), but there are limited studies of PRS for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) prediction.

Objective: We assessed the value of including multiple PRS for cardiovascular risk factors (CV-PRS) for incident AF and VA prediction.

Methods: We used 158,733 individuals of European ancestry from UK Biobank to build 3 models for AF: CHARGE-AF (AF1), AF1 + AF-PRS (AF2), AF2 + CV-PRS (AF3).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Inappropriate therapy (IAT) is a significant issue associated with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy, particularly highlighted in early subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) studies which showed high rates of inappropriate shocks (IAS).
  • The PRAETORIAN trial, an international study with 849 patients, found no major differences in IAT and IAS rates between S-ICD and transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) groups, as both groups had similar cumulative incidences.
  • Key predictors for IAT varied between the two groups, with TV-ICD patients experiencing IAT mainly from supraventricular tachycardias, while S-ICD patients faced issues from cardiac oversensing
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Among inherited cardiomyopathies involving the left ventricle, whether dilated or not, certain genotypes carry a well-established arrhythmic risk, notably manifested as sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT). Nonetheless, the precise localization and electrophysiological profile of this substrate remain undisclosed across different genotypes.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with cardiomyopathy and left ventricle involvement due to high-risk genetic variants and SMVT treated by electrophysiological study were recruited from 18 European/US centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The S-ICD was created to eliminate lead-related issues found in the TV-ICD, as it is an external device that sits under the skin rather than using leads inside the body.
  • This analysis comes from the PRAETORIAN trial, where patients were randomly assigned to either S-ICD or TV-ICD and assessed for quality of life through various questionnaires at different stages.
  • Results showed no significant differences in physical and mental well-being between the groups, but patients who experienced a shock recently reported lower social functioning and emotional health compared to those who did not.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF