Objective/background: The short-term efficacy and safety of daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, has been demonstrated in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder. The objective of this study was to evaluate, in a non-overlapping patient population to the short-term study, the long-term safety and efficacy of daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder.
Patients/methods: In this Phase 3 open-label study conducted in Japan, 154 patients with insomnia disorder were randomized to daridorexant 50 mg (n = 102) or 25 mg (n = 52) for 52 weeks.
Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist for the treatment of insomnia. We report results from the first two randomised, double-blind clinical studies of daridorexant in Japanese subjects. In the Phase 1 study, daridorexant (10, 25, 50 mg) or placebo were administered in the morning for 4 days in 24 young (mean age 26.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: This Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder.
Patients/methods: 490 patients with insomnia disorder from 95 sites in Japan were randomized to daridorexant 50 mg (n = 163), 25 mg (n = 163) or placebo (n = 164) for 4 weeks, followed by a 7-day placebo run-out and a 30-day safety follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoints, in hierarchical order, were change from baseline at Week 4 in subjective total sleep time (sTST) and subjective latency to sleep onset (sLSO), for daridorexant 50 mg vs placebo.
Objective: Clazosentan has been investigated globally for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The authors evaluated its effects on vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality following aSAH in Japanese patients.
Methods: Two similar double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies were conducted in 57 Japanese centers in patients with aSAH, after aneurysms were secured by endovascular coiling in one study and surgical clipping in the other.
Objectives: To investigate the clinical impact of 1-year certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy added to the first year of 2-year methotrexate (MTX) therapy, compared with 2-year therapy with MTX alone.
Methods: MTX-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognostic factors were eligible to enter Certolizumab-Optimal Prevention of joint damage for Early RA (C-OPERA), a multicentre, randomised, controlled study, which consisted of a 52-week double-blind (DB) period and subsequent 52-week post treatment (PT) period. Patients were randomised to optimised MTX+CZP (n=159) or optimised MTX+placebo (PBO; n=157).
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) with and without loading dose (LD) in a post-hoc analysis of two Japanese clinical studies.
Methods: Data from the double-blind trials (DBT) J-RAPID and HIKARI, and their open-label extension (OLE) studies, were used. Patients randomized to CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) groups starting with LD (400 mg Weeks 0/2/4; LD group; J-RAPID: n = 82, HIKARI: n = 116) and patients randomized to placebo groups who subsequently started CZP Q2W without LD in the OLEs (No-LD group; J-RAPID: n = 61, HIKARI: n = 99) were analyzed.
Objectives: This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 1/2 study (NCT01449071) assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of epratuzumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus despite standard of care.
Methods: Twenty patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to placebo or one of four epratuzumab dose regimens (100 mg every other week [Q2W], 400 mg Q2W, 600 mg every week [QW], or 1200 mg Q2W) administered during an initial 4-week dosing period. Adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed.
Objectives: This phase II, dose-ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (NCT01463059) evaluated efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ), a humanized anti-interleukin 6 monoclonal antibody, in Asian patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had previously failed anti-TNF therapy.
Methods: Patients were randomized to one of six treatment arms: placebo or OKZ (60 mg/120 mg/240 mg every four weeks [Q4W]; or 60 mg/120 mg every two weeks [Q2W]); stratified by country and number of prior anti-TNFs. Primary efficacy variable was Week 12 change from baseline (CFB) in DAS28 CRP for 4-week cumulative dose groups of OKZ and placebo; secondary efficacy variables were Week 12 ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 response rates.