Aim: Clinical trials of antidepressants often fail to demonstrate their efficacy versus placebo, suggesting that patient selection based on physician ratings of depression may contribute to a high placebo response.
Methods: In the CCT-004 trial of vortioxetine, central monitoring was employed to compare physician and patient ratings of depression and anxiety at baseline and over time to identify factors contributing to a large placebo response, as well as to explore the potential of a unique patient-rated clinical measure combining QIDS-J and Himorogi Self-rating Anxiety Scale (HSAS), to contribute to optimal patient selection at baseline and patient monitoring over time.
Results: The CCT-004 trial showed similar trends between the QIDS-J and MADRS (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) ratings.
Objective: How honestly patients report their symptoms and medication adherence to their physicians has not been adequately addressed in patients with depression. We therefore conducted a large-scale Internet survey in an effort to discover how successful physicians are in eliciting the truth from their patients and also to examine reasons for patients' truth-concealing behaviors.
Method: 2,354 participants who had received treatment for depression within the past year and had been diagnosed with depression by Patient Health Questionaire were identified from 323,226 registrants at the Macromill database through screening procedures.
Background: Adherence has recently been suggested to be divided into these two components: persistence (i.e., whether patients continue treatment or not) and compliance (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF