Publications by authors named "Neha Sachdev"

The North Carolina Medical Society (NCMS) and American Medical Association (AMA) collaborated to support diabetes prevention efforts in North Carolina (NC) with a physician champion initiative focused on tracking and increasing referrals to the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). Three focus areas to effectively engage and utilize physician champions included: (1) self-adoption within their practice, (2) engagement and outreach with other healthcare leaders, and (3) influence to peers and colleagues. Six NC physician champions were selected to support the work from January 2020 to January 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The early period of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid increase in out-of-office care. To capture the impact from COVID-19 on care for patients with hypertension, a questionnaire was disseminated to community health center clinicians. The extent, types, and causes of care delays and disruptions were assessed along with adaptations and innovations used to address them.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Prediabetes is a serious public health concern, with 34.5% of US adults meeting the criteria for prediabetes. The American Diabetes Association has highlighted metformin therapy as a consideration for individuals with BMI 35 kg/m, those aged 60 years, and women with a history of gestational diabetes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Approximately 1 in 3 American adults has prediabetes, a condition characterized by blood glucose levels that are above normal, not in the type 2 diabetes ranges, and that increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Evidence-based treatments can be used to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in adults with prediabetes. The American Medical Association (AMA) has collaborated with health care organizations across the country to build sustainable diabetes prevention strategies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Increased investment in primary care is associated with lower healthcare costs and improved population health. The allocation of scarce resources should be driven by robust models that adequately describe primary care activities and spending within a health system, and allow comparisons within and across health systems. However, disparate definitions result in wide variations in estimates of spending on primary care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The dominant payment model in U.S. primary care is fee-for-service (FFS), which emphasizes volume, but there is a shift towards value-based payment models like the Comprehensive Primary Care Payment (CPCP) model developed by the Family Medicine for America's Health (FMAHealth) Payment Team.
  • A study conducted by the FMAHealth Payment Team from 2016-2017 analyzed various primary care payment models, leading to a clearer understanding of successful and unsuccessful components in these arrangements.
  • The CPCP methodology provides a calculator that establishes base rates and customizable modifiers based on factors such as chronic disease, social determinants of health, and quality, aiming to facilitate the transition from volume-based to value-based care
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Type 2 diabetes can be prevented or delayed in people with prediabetes through participation in an intensive lifestyle change program (LCP), particularly one based on the Diabetes Prevention Program research study. Digital health offers opportunities to extend the reach of such LCPs and possibly improve on these programs, which traditionally have been delivered in person. In this review, we describe the current state of evidence regarding digital health-supported LCPs and discuss gaps in research and opportunities for future efforts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Problem: People of color suffer worse health outcomes than their White counterparts due, in part, to limited access to high-quality specialty care.

Purpose: This article describes the events that led to the Bronx Health REACH coalition's decision to file a civil rights complaint with the New York State Office of the Attorney General alleging that three academic medical centers in New York City discriminated on the basis of payer status and race in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Hill-Burton Act, New York State regulations, and New York City Human Rights Law.

Key Points: Although the problem has not yet been resolved, the related community mobilization efforts have raised public awareness about the impact of disparate care, strengthened the coalition's commitment to achieve health equality, and garnered support among many city and state legislators.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF