Clinical Predictors of Good/Poor Response to Growth Hormone Treatment in Children with Idiopathic Short Stature.

Introduction: Children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) are known to have varying responses to growth hormone (GH) treatment (GHT).

Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis to identify clinical characteristics predictive of good and poor response during year 1 of GHT. Data from the NordiNet® IOS (NCT00960128) and the ANSWER Program (NCT01009905) were used.

Long-term Effectiveness and Safety of GH Replacement Therapy in Adults ≥60 Years: Data From NordiNet® IOS and ANSWER.

Context: Effectiveness and safety data on GH replacement therapy (GHRT) in older adults with adult GH deficiency (AGHD) are limited.

Objective: To compare GHRT safety and clinical outcomes in older (≥60 years and, for some outcomes, ≥75 years) and middle-aged (35-<60 years) patients with AGHD.

Design/setting: Ten-year follow-up, real-world data from 2 large noninterventional studies-NordiNet® International Outcome Study (IOS) and the American Norditropin® Studies: Web-Enabled Research (ANSWER) Program-were analyzed.

Weekly somapacitan had no adverse effects on glucose metabolism in adults with growth hormone deficiency.

Purpose: The long-term effects of long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) analogues on glucose metabolism in adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) are not known. We investigated the impact of LAGH somapacitan, administered once-weekly, on glucose metabolism in patients with AGHD.

Methods: In post hoc-defined analyses, we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).

Reduced CV risk with long-term GH replacement in AGHD: data from two large observational studies.

Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Long-term growth hormone (GH) treatment could improve CV outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate CV disease risk in patients with AGHD who received GH replacement therapy for up to 10 years as part of NordiNet® IOS (NCT00960128) and the ANSWER Program (NCT01009905).

Pregnancy outcomes in women receiving growth hormone replacement therapy enrolled in the NordiNet® International Outcome Study (IOS) and the American Norditropin® Studies: Web-Enabled Research (ANSWER) Program.

Purpose: Data on the safety of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy during pregnancy are limited. We report a combined analysis of data from pregnant women treated with GH while enrolled in two non-interventional, multicenter studies: NordiNet® International Outcome Study (IOS) and the American Norditropin® Studies: Web-Enabled Research (ANSWER) Program.

Methods: Pregnancy data were pooled from NordiNet® IOS and the ANSWER Program.

The role of growth hormone device optimization in patient-reported outcomes: real-world evidence from South Korea.

Background: Growth hormone (GH) treatment preference and adherence are affected by delivery device convenience, injection-site pain, confidence in correct dose administration, and device satisfaction. This survey investigated if switching device to NordiFlex® improved treatment experience in pediatric patients in South Korea.

Design And Methods: Patients aged 4-≤18 years were surveyed.

Shared Decision-Making in Growth Hormone Therapy-Implications for Patient Care.

Several studies have shown that adherence to growth hormone therapy (GHT) is not optimal. There are several reasons why patients may not fully adhere to their treatment regimen and this may have implications on treatment success, patient outcomes and healthcare spending and resourcing. A change in healthcare practices, from a physician paternalistic to a more patient autonomous approach to healthcare, has encouraged a greater onus on a shared decision-making (SDM) process whereby patients are actively encouraged to participate in their own healthcare decisions.