Trauma centers need objective feedback on performance to inform quality improvement efforts. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program recently published recommended methodology for case mix adjustment and benchmarking performance. We tested the feasibility of applying this methodology to develop risk-adjusted mortality models for a statewide trauma system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: As emergency care becomes increasingly regionalized, systems planners must determine how system expansion impacts existing system assets. We hypothesized that accrediting new Level II and III trauma centers impacted the trauma patient census and severity at a nearby Level I trauma center and estimated the magnitude of the impact.
Methods: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using monthly patient counts during the past 10 years for five trauma centers located near one another in Pennsylvania.
Background: The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) has been the approach to trauma outcome prediction during the past 20 years and has been adopted by many commercial registries. Unfortunately, its survival predictions are based upon coefficients that were derived from a data set collected in the 1980s and updated only once using a data set collected in the early 1990s. We hypothesized that the improvements in trauma care during the past 20 years would lead to improved survival in a large database, thus making the TRISS biased.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOlder adults tend to have poorer outcomes compared to younger adults following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Currently, there is a need for research focusing on how elderly TBI has changed as the U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF