Platform trials.

For the past few years, platform trials have experienced a significant increase, recently amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. The implementation of a platform trial is particularly useful in certain pathologies, particularly when there is a significant number of drug candidates to be assessed, a rapid evolution of the standard of care or in situations of urgent need for evaluation, during which the pooling of protocols and infrastructure optimizes the number of patients to be enrolled, the costs, and the deadlines for carrying out the investigation. However, the specificity of platform trials raises methodological, ethical, and regulatory issues, which have been the subject of the round table and which are presented in this article.

How has the future investment program stimulated research and innovation in health?

Ten years after the launch of the Future Investment Program (Programme d'Investissement d'Avenir, PIA) and the implementation of these tools, one of Giens' roundtable workshop wanted to further explore the impact of PIA on health research and innovation with the aim of preparing action reports (bibliometrics, valuation, reputation) based on 2019 findings and the history of PIA deployment in relation to the healthcare sector; to analyze the development of the industrial sector vis-a-vis the PIA actions and to examine how the specific actions and the healthcare sector in general were able to duly articulate themselves, or, take form, given existing structures or organizations and contribute to site policies through Idex/Isite. Five success keys have been identified, which should serve as a strategic compass for future action plans to develop health innovation: Full trust governance between the project manager and the institution, driven by project objectives; An increased role of universities in the steering of PIA objects, joining together in a federation, in a site policy with the Hospital University Centres and Public Scientific and Technological Establishments; A simplification of public/private partnership schemes, in the nature of the Assessment and Action Plans, and in the responsiveness of the institutions; help with the development of local ecosystems, the fostering and support of young researchers; early cross-fertilization between the academic and industrial worlds.

From single-arm studies to externally controlled studies. Methodological considerations and guidelines.

Single-arm studies are sometimes used as pivotal studies but they have methodological limitations which prevent them from obtaining the high level of reliability as for a randomised controlled study which remains the gold standard in the evaluation of new treatments. The objective of this roundtable was to discuss the limitations of these single-arm studies, to analyse available and acceptable solutions in order to propose guidelines for their conduct and assessment. Single-arm studies themselves are intrinsically inappropriate for demonstrating the benefit of a new treatment because it is impossible to infer the benefit from a value obtained under treatment without knowing what it would have been in the absence of the new treatment.

[Not Available].

The constant development of health technologies, combined with the increase in the cost of treatment, means that States must continually make choices about the introduction of new technologies into their healthcare system and how they are to be funded. In France, the systematic participation of patients in these processes is one of the targets to be met in terms of healthcare democracy. Although, on an international level, patient involvement in these assessments is constantly growing, it is difficult to define due to the presence of unstabilised elements in terms of both terminology and assessment methods.

Detection of glioblastoma response to temozolomide combined with bevacizumab based on μMRI and μPET imaging reveals [18F]-fluoro-L-thymidine as an early and robust predictive marker for treatment efficacy.

The individualized care of glioma patients ought to benefit from imaging biomarkers as precocious predictors of therapeutic efficacy. Contrast enhanced MRI and [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET are routinely used in clinical settings; their ability to forecast the therapeutic response is controversial. The objectives of our preclinical study were to analyze sensitive µMRI and/or µPET imaging biomarkers to predict the efficacy of anti-angiogenic and/or chemotherapeutic regimens.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and pregnancy before the eculizumab era: the French experience.

Background: Pregnancy in women with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria is rare, with few reports on maternal and fetal mortality rates.

Design And Methods: A specific questionnaire designed to solicit data on pregnancies in women with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria was sent to all members of the French Society of Hematology in January 2008.

Results: We identified 27 pregnancies in 22 women at 10 French Society of Hematology centers between 1978 and 2008.

[Eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria].

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria is a rare acquired clonal of the hematopoietic stem cell due to acquired mutation of the PIG-A gene. This results in the lack of two GPI-anchored membrane proteins involved in the inhibition of complement attack, thus explaining red cells hemolysis. The development of an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody (eculizumab) had profoundly modified the treatment of the the hemolytic form of the disease.

Rituximab in the management of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after solid organ transplantation: proceed with caution.

The introduction of single-agent rituximab has markedly changed the approach to therapy of patients with post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), but response to treatment varies substantially between patients. In the current report, we analyze long-term efficacy of single-agent rituximab in 60 patients and present factors predictive of progression-free and overall survival. Twelve months after completing first-line treatment, 34 of 60 patients (57%) had progressive disease, resulting in a median progression-free survival of 6.