Two Year Clinical Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Are Not Dependent on Femoral Head Composition.

Background: Assessment of clinical outcomes and patient quality of life after total hip arthroplasty continues to grow in importance with the focus on how bearing surfaces affect long-term survival, wear, and cost. Further, as quality measures have become incorporated into reimbursement, there is a need to quantify factors which may influence these outcomes. Currently, there is a paucity of literature regarding the effects of the femoral head composition on clinical outcomes or quality of life.

Revision total hip arthroplasty with modular femoral stems.

As the rate of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) rises, attention must be paid to potential complications relating to bone loss, soft tissue deficiencies, and loss of tissue planes. Using modular femoral stems in revision surgery allows for varying amounts of bone loss in the proximal and distal femur while letting the surgeon adjust rotation, leg length, and offset. We retrospectively reviewed 125 patients that underwent revision THA with a modular femoral component system and had minimum 2 year follow-up.