Highly multidrug-resistant HIV: clonal analysis and therapeutic strategies.

Objectives: There are today HIV-infected patients in therapeutic impasses because of highly multidrug-resistant (HMDR) viruses. We studied the distribution of resistance mutations at clonal level, and we analysed the therapeutic strategies used in such cases to achieve undetectable viraemia.

Methods: The HMDR profile was defined as a genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) ≤ 1.

Pitfalls of HIV genotypic tropism testing after treatment interruption.

Objectives: The genotypic method is reliable enough for the determination of tropism and largely preferred in Europe. However, careful interpretation is essential when assessing HIV genotypic resistance during treatment interruption (TI) due to the possible disappearance of resistant strains. The results of HIV genotypic tropism testing in such a context remain unknown.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir double-dose in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients: the TENOPLUS study.

Drug resistance is an increasing problem in the treatment of HIV infection. Tenofovir has been shown to inhibit HIV replication even with thymidine-associated resistance mutations (TAMs) if they are limited to two or less. Double-dose of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (600 mg QD) was used to determine weather the drug could be virologically effective in patients harbouring HIV-strains resistant to nucleoside analogues (NRTI).

Foscarnet salvage therapy for patients with late-stage HIV disease and multiple drug resistance.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of foscarnet on HIV infection in patients with late-stage HIV disease and multiple drug resistance.

Methods: Three drugs experienced patients with plasma viral load (pVL) > 50,000 copies/ml and CD4+ T-cell counts < 100/mm3 were eligible for this open-label, single-arm, add-on pilot study. Foscarnet induction therapy consisted of 5 g intravenously twice daily for 6 weeks, in addition to a stable antiretroviral regimen.

No benefit of a structured treatment interruption based on genotypic resistance in heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients.

Objective: To evaluate the potential benefits of a tailored antiretroviral treatment interruption with duration based on the observed reversion of resistance mutations.

Methods: In this open single-arm pilot study, 23 patients with multiple treatment failure interrupted therapy and underwent longitudinal genotypic resistance testing. Salvage gigatherapy was started when resistance mutations to at least two antiretroviral drug classes reverted.

Characterization of genotypic determinants in HR-1 and HR-2 gp41 domains in individuals with persistent HIV viraemia under T-20.

We analysed the genetic changes in gp41 in a population of 30 heavily pretreated HIV-1-infected patients failing on a T-20-containing salvage therapy. This study confirms the key role of the number of drugs presumed to be still effective associated with T-20 in the magnitude of the virological response. Our results suggest that only HR-1 sequencing is necessary to characterize resistance to T-20, and that HR-2 domain sequencing is probably not required.

Resistance profiles observed in virological failures after 24 weeks of amprenavir/ritonavir containing regimen in protease inhibitor experienced patients.

Amprenavir (APV) is an HIV protease inhibitor (PI) used for the treatment of either naive or PI-experienced HIV-infected patients. Several genotypic resistance pathways in protease gene have been described to be associated to unboosted APV failure (I50V, V32I + I47V, I54L/M, or less commonly I84V, which may be accompanied by one ore more accessory mutations such as L10F, L33F, M46I/L). The aims of this study were to investigate the efficacy up to week 24 of an APV plus ritonavir containing regimen in PI experienced patients and to determine the genotypic resistance profiles emerging in patients failing to this therapy.

Genotypic inhibitory quotient as predictor of virological response to ritonavir-amprenavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Forty-nine protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced but amprenavir (APV)-naïve patients experiencing virological failure were treated with ritonavir (RTV) (100 mg twice a day [b.i.d.