Recovery from depressive illness does fit an exponential model.

A very large number of therapeutic trials of antidepressant drugs have been reported in the scientific literature. Until now, the comparison of one drug with another, or with placebo, has been performed typically by comparing the scores on depression rating scales of the two groups of patients at fixed points of time after the beginning of therapy. It was postulated in 1989 that the curves of the recovery scores followed an exponential curve of the formula y = ae-bx + c.

Recent advances in antidepressant drugs.

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are notorious for a number of disadvantages, but particularly for an array of side-effects that leads to poor compliance, and also for a dangerous toxicity in overdose. Lofepramine is a new tricyclic that seems safer. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are more limited in their actions.

The treatment of sleep disorders.

Narcolepsy is clinically associated with cataplexy, sleep paralysis and hypnagogic hallucinations. It is treated by reassurance (that there is no physical disease) and by stimulants such as ephedrine and amphetamine on an intermittent basis. The special tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine is also used, and mono-amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are useful in theory.

Profiles of antidepressant activity with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.

The Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a 10 item severity scale constructed to be sensitive to change with treatment. It was designed to be sensitive for individual items and is therefore useful for measuring differential profiles of action. The MADRS profiles of activity were examined in a six-week double-blind comparative group study of depressed patients treated with mianserin or zimeldine.