The cytological screening history of 469 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri; does interval carcinoma exist?

Background: To determine whether interval carcinomas occurred and to determine the level of screening-participation by women who developed a cervical carcinoma.

Methods: A retrospective study of the cytological history of 469 patients diagnosed between January 1980 and December 1989 with cervical squamous cell carcinoma in 12 hospitals in the western part of The Netherlands. Clinical data, and cervical smear histories in 3.

Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?

In 632 women visiting a family planning clinic, paired cervical smears were taken using a wooden spatula and a Cytobrush. Of the spatula smears 7.8% were unreliable with too little or scanty material to allow a cytologic diagnosis (class 0); 17.

Performance of the Cytobrush in patients at risk for cervical pathology: does it add anything to the wooden spatula?

In 130 high-risk patients for cervical pathology paired smears were obtained with a wooden spatula and a Cytobrush. The Cytobrush was useful in lowering the amount of inadequate smears (2 vs 22%, p less than or equal to 0.01), and detected more abnormal cytology in combination with the spatula compared to the spatula smear alone (27 vs 35%, p less than or equal to 0.

The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.

In 30 patients whose last cervical smear had lacked endocervical cells, two new samples were collected, one with a cotton-tipped applicator and the other with the recently developed Cytobrush cervical brush. With the cotton swab, no endocervical cells were present in the repeat smears of 21 patients, as compared with only 3 Cytobrush smears lacking endocervical cells; the difference is statistically significant (P less than .001).