In order to identify genomic changes associated with a resistant phenotype acquisition, we used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to compare a human ovarian cell line, Igrov1, and four derived subcell lines, resistant to vincristine and presenting a reversion of malignant properties. Multicolor FISH (Multiplex-FISH and Spectral Karyotype) and conventional FISH are also used to elucidate the karyotype of parental cell line. The drug-resistant subcell lines displayed many chromosomal abnormalities suggesting the implication of different pathways leading to a multidrug resistance phenotype.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Genet Cytogenet
January 2002
In order to identify genomic changes associated with drug-resistance acquisition, we performed R-banding karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and comparative genomic hybridization to compare a human T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, CEM-wild type, and a subline with resistance to vinblastine (CEM-VLB) and overexpressing P-glycoprotein. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed that the CEM-VLB cell line carried chemoresistance-associated chromosomal abnormalities (amplification of 7q11 approximately q22, losses of chromosomes 2, 3, 5, 9, 10, and 16, and deletion of 4q13 approximately qter). Fluorescence in situ hybridization identified an amplified 7q21 region translocated on the short arm of a chromosome 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn order to identify genomic changes associated with an etoposide resistance acquisition, we used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to compare a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line, A549 wild type, and three sublines, A549-VP1-3, exposed to increasing concentrations of the topoisomerase II inhibitor, VP16. R-banding karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and Southern blot for the MLL gene were also performed. The CGH analysis showed that the A549-VP3 cell line shared chemoresistance-specific abnormalities (amplification of 11q23-qter, loss of chromosome 17, and deletions of 2p14-pter and 2q23-q24).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIdentification of supernumerary de novo marker chromosomes was considered up to now as difficult and sometimes impossible with classical cytogenetical banding methods. The determination of their chromosomal origin is now easier with fluorescent in situ hybridisation techniques and enables an exact correlation between chromosomal aberration and phenotypic features to be established. The authors describe the use of chromosome painting with chromosome 13 and 18 Whole library DNA probe for identification of supernumerary markers in tow patients with congenital disorders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF