Carotid endarterectomy for symptomic and asymptomic stenosis: Report of 65388 cases (Russian register).

Aim: Analysis of in-hospital and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic stenoses.

Materials And Methods: The sample was formed by completely including all cases of carotid endarterectomy ( = 65,388) performed during the period from May 1, 2015 to November 1, 2023. Depending on the symptomatic/asymptomatic nature of the stenosis, all patients were divided into two groups: group 1 - = 39,172 (75.

Hospital and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy in patients with different severity of coronary artery lesion according to syntax score.

Aim: Analysis of in-hospital and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy (CEE) in patients with different severity of coronary atherosclerosis.

Material And Methods: This comparative, retrospective, open study for the period from January 2013 to April 2020 included 1719 patients operated on for occlusive-stenotic lesions of the internal carotid arteries (ICA). Classical and eversion CEA were used as revascularization strategies.

Prospective multicenter online testing of the carotid endarterectomy risk stratification calculator carotidscore.ru.

Aim: To evaluate the incidence of complications, including fatal outcomes, ischemic strokes, and transient ischemic attacks, associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients categorized as low-, medium-, and high-risk based on their CarotidSCORE (carotidscore.ru).

Material And Methods: This prospective, multicenter study was conducted from January 1, 2022, to December 20, 2022, and enrolled 5,496 patients with stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA), who were categorized into four groups according to their risk level.

[Long-term results conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy].

Objective: To analyze immediate and long-term results of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within a multicenter registry.

Material And Methods: This retrospective, multi-center, comparative study included 375 patients who underwent CEA between February 1, 2018 and February 1, 2022. Depending on the type of operation, the sample was stratified into the eversion CEA (group 1, =218) and conventional CEA with plasty of the reconstruction area with a diepoxy-treated xenopericardium patch (group 2, =157).

Effects of different types of carotid endarterectomy on the course of resistant arterial hypertension.

Objective: Analysis of the dynamics of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the results of various types of carotid endarterectomy (СЕЕ) (classical with plasty of the reconstruction zone with a patch, eversion, formation of a new bifurcation, autoarterial reconstruction, glomus-saving techniques) in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (RAH).

Materials And Methods: The actual cohort, comparative, retrospective, open research for the period from January 2013 to December 2021 includes 1577 patients with significant hemodynamic stenosis of the internal carotid artery Depending on revascularization strategy five groups were formed: Group 1: 18.3% ( = 289) - classical Carotid endarterectomy with plasty of the reconstruction zone with a patch (from diepoxy-treated xenopericardium or synthetic); Group 2: 29.