Anti-inflammatory effect of interleukin-6 highly enriched in secretome of two clinically relevant sources of mesenchymal stromal cells.

Despite several advances in the field of regenerative medicine, clinical management of extensive skin wounds or burns remains a major therapeutic issue. During the past few years, Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic tool to promote tissue repair through their anti-inflammatory, pro-trophic and pro-remodeling effects. They exert their biological activity mainly via the secretion of soluble bioactive molecules such as cytokines, growth factors, proteins and microRNAs which can be encapsulated within extracellular vesicles (EV).

IL-1β-Primed Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Improve Epidermal Substitute Engraftment and Wound Healing via Matrix Metalloproteinases and Transforming Growth Factor-β1.

Since the 1980s, deep and extensive skin wounds and burns are treated with autologous split-thickness skin grafts, or cultured epidermal autografts, when donor sites are limited. However, the clinical use of cultured epidermal autografts often remains unsatisfactory because of poor engraftment rates, altered wound healing, and reduced skin functionality. In the past few decades, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have raised much attention because of their anti-inflammatory, protrophic, and pro-remodeling capacities.

Influence of fibrin matrices and their released factors on epidermal substitute phenotype and engraftment.

Cultured epithelial autografts (CEAs) represent a life-saving surgical technique for full-thickness skin burns covering more than 60% total body surface area. However, CEAs present numerous drawbacks leading to heavy cosmetic and functional sequelae. In our previous study, we showed that human plasma-based fibrin matrices (hPBM) could improve the reparative potential of CEAs.

Bioengineering a human plasma-based epidermal substitute with efficient grafting capacity and high content in clonogenic cells.

Unlabelled: Cultured epithelial autografts (CEAs) produced from a small, healthy skin biopsy represent a lifesaving surgical technique in cases of full-thickness skin burn covering >50% of total body surface area. CEAs also present numerous drawbacks, among them the use of animal proteins and cells, the high fragility of keratinocyte sheets, and the immaturity of the dermal-epidermal junction, leading to heavy cosmetic and functional sequelae. To overcome these weaknesses, we developed a human plasma-based epidermal substitute (hPBES) for epidermal coverage in cases of massive burn, as an alternative to traditional CEA, and set up critical quality controls for preclinical and clinical studies.