Semantic partitioning facilitates memory for object location through category-partition cueing.

In our lived environments, objects are often semantically organised (e.g., cookware and cutlery are placed close together in the kitchen).

Semantic relatedness can impair memory for item locations.

While memory for semantically related items is improved over unrelated items in many cases, relatedness can also lead to memory costs. Here we examined how the semantic relatedness of words within a display influenced memory for their locations. Participants learned the locations of words inside grid displays; the words in a given display were either from a single category or were from different assorted categories.

Socially Communicative Eye Contact and Gender Affect Memory.

Because of their value as a socially communicative cue, researchers have strived to understand how the gaze of other people influences a variety of cognitive processes. Recent work in social attention suggests that the use of images of people in laboratory studies, as a substitute for real people, may not effectively test socially communicative aspects of eye gaze. As attention affects many other cognitive processes, it is likely that social attention between real individuals could also affect other cognitive processes, such as memory.

Spatial habit competes with effort to determine human spatial organization.

Despite the important role that the physical environment plays in shaping human cognition, few studies have endeavoured to experimentally examine the principles underlying how individuals organize objects in their space. The current investigation examines the idea that humans organize objects in their space in order to minimize effort or maximize performance. We devised a novel spatial organization task whereby participants freely arranged objects in the context of a writing task.

Looking away: distractor influences on saccadic trajectory and endpoint in prosaccade and antisaccade tasks.

Successful target selection often occurs concurrently with distractor inhibition. A better understanding of the former thus requires a thorough study of the competition that arises between target and distractor representations. In the present study, we explore whether the presence of a distractor influences saccade processing via interfering with visual target and/or saccade goal representations.

A fresh look at saccadic trajectories and task irrelevant stimuli: Social relevance matters.

A distractor placed nearby a saccade target will cause interference during saccade planning and execution, and as a result will cause the saccade's trajectory to curve in a systematic way. It has been demonstrated that making a distractor more task-relevant, for example by increasing its similarity to the target, will increase the interference it imposes on the saccade and generate more deviant saccadic trajectories. Is the extent of a distractor's interference within the oculomotor system limited to its relevance to a particular current task, or can a distractor's general real-world meaning influence saccade trajectories even when it is made irrelevant within a task? Here, it is tested whether a task-irrelevant distractor can influence saccade trajectory if it depicts a stimulus that is normally socially relevant.