Background: Data regarding teledermatology for patch testing are limited.
Objectives: Compare patch test readings and final interpretation by two in-person dermatologists (IPDs) with eight teledermatologists (TDs).
Methods: Patch tested patients had photographs taken of 70 screening series of allergens at 48 hours and second readings.
Background: There are limited data regarding the prevalence and concentration of isothiazolinone preservatives in consumer adhesives.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and concentration of 5 specific isothiazolinones (methylisothiazolinone [MI], methylchloroisothiazolinone [MCI], benzisothiazolinone [BIT], butyl BIT, and octylisothiazolinone) in US adhesives.
Methods: Thirty-eight consumer adhesives were analyzed using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometry.
Background: There is limited information regarding isothiazolinone content in residential wall paints in the United States.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of 5 isothiazolinones-methylisothiazolinone (MI), methylchloroisothiazolinone, benzisothiazolinone (BIT), butyl BIT, and octylisothiazolinone-in US residential wall paints.
Methods: Forty-seven paints were obtained from retailers in Minneapolis/St Paul, Minnesota.
Background: Rubber accelerators play a significant role in glove-related occupational contact dermatitis, especially among health care workers. Currently, there is limited information readily available outlining the accelerators used in specific medical examination and surgical gloves.
Objective: The aim of this study was to ascertain the accelerators used in medical examination and surgical gloves for major glove manufacturers within the United States.
Background: There is limited information regarding contact dermatitis (CD) associated with skin cleansers (SCs).
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of allergic patch test (APT) reactions and irritant CD (ICD) associated with SCs.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed using North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2000-2014.
A 33-year-old woman presented to our clinic for suspected photoallergic contact dermatitis with a recent episode of severe, vesicular dermatitis involving exposed skin and correlating with relocation to a new home. Biopsy results showed spongiotic and lichenoid dermatitis with eosinophils. Patch test results showed a very strong (+++) reaction to methylisothiazolinone (MI), mild (+) reaction to MI/methylchloroisothiazolinone, and no reaction to benzisothiazolinone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF