Finite element analysis of the effect of framework material and thickness on the biomechanical performance of 'All‑on‑Four' full-arch prosthesis.

The aim of this research was to evaluate the stress distribution in the 'All-on-Four' prosthesis and the surrounding bone, with different framework materials and thicknesses. Five frameworks (alumina, zirconia, titanium, fiberglass reinforced resin (FRR), and polyether ether ketone (PEEK)) with two thicknesses (3.5 &5.

Evaluation of stresses on mandible bone and prosthetic parts in fixed prosthesis by utilizing CFR-PEEK, PEKK and PEEK frameworks.

Fixed prostheses are appropriate treatment solutions for edentulous patients. In fixed prostheses, following "All on four", titanium frameworks are commonly used to support the implants. However, the limitations of titanium have prompted researchers to search for alternative materials (e.

Evaluation of stress and strain on mandible caused using "All-on-Four" system from PEEK in hybrid prosthesis: finite-element analysis.

Hybrid prostheses have recently been used as suitable treatment alternatives for edentulous individuals to restore the mastication mechanism. These prostheses utilize "All on four" concept, in which four implants are inserted into the jaw bone, and supported by a bar. Titanium is usually used in the fabrication of "All on four" parts due to its good mechanical properties.

Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.

Objectives: This in vivo study aims to assess the accuracy of the digital intraoral implant impression technique, the conventional closed-tray impression technique, and open-tray impression techniques in a standardized method of data segmentation along with the best-fit algorithm to overcome the inconsistency of results of previous studies regarding implant impression techniques.

Materials And Methods: Sixteen implants were placed in eight patients. Each patient has undergone four impression techniques: direct intraoral scanning of the stock abutment, intraoral scanning using a scan body, conventional closed tray impression technique, and the conventional open tray impression technique.

Accuracy of digital auricular impression using intraoral scanner versus conventional impression technique for ear rehabilitation: A controlled clinical trial.

Purpose: This research aims to compare the accuracy of different auricular impression techniques used to produce either a mirror image of the unaffected ear or a surgical stent and template for auricular rehabilitation. The research compares two digital ear impression techniques using an Intra-Oral digital Scanner (IOS) (with /without markers) versus a traditional technique using hydrocolloid impression materials.

Material And Methods: Eight participants were selected with intact right ears.