Publications by authors named "Minami Naito"

Objective: Mirtazapine and SSRIs are widely prescribed as first-line agents for late-life depression. However, evidence for these drugs is mostly based on non-elderly patients. Therefore, we reanalyzed a randomized controlled trial of mirtazapine versus SSRIs for depression in a sub-population of late-life patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This study examined the efficacy of an 8-week occupational therapy program incorporating mindfulness (MOT) as a form of psychiatric rehabilitation to ameliorate residual social and occupational impairment in patients with anxiety disorders and depression. The objective was to evaluate the effects of MOT on their personal well-being and to assess the impact of MOT on brain function using quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG).

Methods: This study was a randomized, wait-list control trial with assessments performed at baseline, post-intervention (9 weeks), and follow-up (18 weeks) in outpatients with anxiety disorders and depression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The treatment course for depression is multifactorial, and the gold standard method for antidepressant selection remains unclear. Therefore, we focused on patients' personality as a possible indicator of the treatment response to mirtazapine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and whether it can contribute to antidepressant selection.

Methods: One hundred one patients with major depressive disorder were randomized at baseline to receive either mirtazapine or SSRI treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study investigated the effectiveness and safety of asenapine, a medication for schizophrenia, by categorizing patients based on their psychiatric symptoms using a standard assessment called the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS).
  • The research involved 529 patients divided into three clusters: those with high positive symptoms (Cluster-P), those with negative symptoms (Cluster-N), and those with generally lower symptoms (Cluster-L).
  • Results showed that both 10 and 20 mg/day of asenapine improved PANSS scores in Clusters-N and-L, while only the 20 mg dose was effective in Cluster-P, indicating that patient symptom backgrounds influence treatment efficacy and safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF