Recommendations for the application and follow-up of quality controls in medical laboratories.

This is a translation of the paper "Recommendations for the application and follow-up of quality controls in medical biology laboratories" published in French in the journal Annales de Biologie Clinique (Recommandations pour la mise en place et le suivi des contrôles de qualité dans les laboratoires de biologie médicale. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2019;77:577-97.

[Recommendations for the application and the follow-up of quality controls in medical biology laboratories].

The recommendations that we formulate in this document come from LABAC, SFBC and FAEEQ. They describe the different steps from the initial application of quality controls, based on risk analysis: the changes of reagent batches or internal quality controls (IQC) batches, the course when IQC are not in accordance with references, the choice of external quality evaluation and the interpretation of its results, the comparability of results obtained in several analysers used in the same laboratory. Lastly, measurement uncertainty, robustness of methods and specificities of near-patient biology and rapid tests are described.

Pre-analytical effects of pneumatic tube system transport on routine haematology and coagulation tests, global coagulation assays and platelet function assays.

Introduction: Pneumatic tube system (PTS) in hospitals is commonly used for the transport of blood samples to clinical laboratories, as it is rapid and cost-effective. The aim was to compare the effects on haematology samples of a newly acquired ~2km-long PTS that links 2 hospitals with usual transport (non-pneumatic tube system, NPTS).

Methods: Complete blood cell count, routine coagulation assays, platelet function tests (PFT) with light-transmission aggregometry and global coagulation assays including ROTEM® and thrombin generation assay (TGA) were performed on blood samples from 30 healthy volunteers and 9 healthy volunteers who agreed to take aspirin prior to blood sampling.

Disk Diffusion Testing for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci: Does Moxalactam Improve upon Cefoxitin?

Disk diffusion testing is widely used to detect methicillin resistance in staphylococci, and cefoxitin is currently considered the best marker for mecA-mediated methicillin resistance. In low-inoculum diffusion testing (colony suspension at 10 CFU/ml), the addition of moxalactam in combination with cefoxitin has been reported to improve on cefoxitin alone for the detection of methicillin-heteroresistant staphylococci. However, moxalactam is absent from EUCAST and CLSI guidelines, which use high-inoculum diffusion testing (colony suspension at 10 CFU/ml), calling into question the potential interest of including moxalactam in their recommendations.