Background: Reducing HIV transmission using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) requires focussing on individuals at high acquisition risk, such as men who have sex with men with a history of nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP). This study aims to characterize longitudinal trends in PrEP uptake and its determinants among nPEP users in Montréal.
Methods: Eligible attendees at Clinique médicale l'Actuel were recruited prospectively starting in October 2000 (nPEP) and January 2013 (PrEP).
Purpose: The was established to monitor the uptake, effectiveness, safety and changes in sexual risk behaviours among individuals receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for the prevention of HIV. This prospective dynamic cohort is based at Clinique médicale l'Actuel, a large sexual health clinic located in Montreal, Canada.
Participants: Since the cohort inception in January of 2013 through June 2018, 2156 individuals consulted for PrEP as participants in the l'Actuel PrEP Cohort.
Background: There is limited evidence on the efficacy of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for sexual exposures. We sought to determine the factors associated with adherence to treatment and describe the incidence of PEP failures in a Montreal clinic.
Methods: We prospectively assessed all patients consulting for PEP following sexual exposures from October 2000 to July 2014.
Background: Despite the benefit of maintaining inactive Nucleotide/side reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in salvage regimens, they are associated with increased toxicity and treatment costs. Current evidence suggests that NRTI-sparing regimens in patients failing ART are non-inferior to NRTI-including regimens. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of removing at least one inactive NRTI on virologic, safety, and financial outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Many studies have shown the superiority of single tablet regimens (STRs) of antiretrovirals for the treatment of HIV in terms of efficacy, adherence and rate of hospitalisation as they offer a low pill burden and once daily dosing. Our objective was to compare the duration of first-line STRs to multi-tablet regimens.
Methods: From our clinical database, we selected patients initiating any of the major first-line regimens between 2007 and 2013.
Background: Current treatment guidelines recommend the use of tenofovir (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) along with a third agent to treat HIV-positive adults. However, other treatment options, including the use of abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) when used with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r), have rarely been studied.
Objective: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the coformulation of ABC/3TC administered with DRV/r in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients.