The article presents a case of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion treated by distalizing the upper and lower teeth, using anchorage from mini implants. A 16-year-old male patient presented with severe upper and lower incisor proclination with protruding lips and a convex profile, with a background of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Instead of having four premolars extracted, retraction of the dentition was decided with absolute anchorage, provided by mini implants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe purpose of this article is to present a computer designed and 3D-printed metal device, which was used for the surgical exposure and orthodontic treatment of maxillary palatally impacted canines. In two cases which presented a palatally impacted canine, a Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) was acquired and an intraoral scanning was performed, to determine the exact location of the canine. Based on a digital model, a device leaning on the teeth and mucosa was designed to serve as a guiding tool for the oral surgeon to expose the crown of the canine and help the orthodontist to provide proper traction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The purpose of the study was to investigate the accuracy of mini-implant placement with the use of a computer designed surgical guide derived by intraoral scanning alongside Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) or the use of a 2D radiograph.
Methods: Thirty-five mini-implants (Aarhus System: = 20, Ø: 1.5 mm and AbsoAnchor: = 15, Ø: 1.
We present the treatment of an injured and avulsed incisor (which was afterwards ankylosed), by subapical osteotomy and conventional orthodontic mechanisms. A 9-year-old boy presented for orthodontic treatment with an injured and avulsed central incisor, which, after initial repositioning, ended up with ankylosis and severe root resorption. The case was treated by single tooth alveolar osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis through conventional orthodontics, advocating for the floating bone concept due to the short vertical distance by which the tooth alveolus part had to be relocated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To investigate the morphological and compositional alterations of retrieved orthodontic mini-implants and the type of adjacent bone, in relation to loading period and anatomical region.
Materials And Methods: Seventy orthodontic mini-implants (Aarhus: n = 35 and AbsoAnchor: n = 35) were placed in the maxilla and mandible of 33 orthodontic patients for anchorage purposes. All mini-implants were immediately loaded for a period specified by treatment plan.