We Still Have a Lot to Learn.

Use of contingent electric skin shock in the treatment of severe problem behavior has been criticized on the grounds that (a) it is not necessary because function-based procedures using positive reinforcement are just as effective; (b) it violates contemporary ethical standards; and (c) it lacks social validity. There are good reasons to challenge these claims. The meaning of "severe problem behavior" is imprecise and we should be cautious in our claims about how to treat it.

Report of the ABAI Task Force on Contingent Electric Skin Shock.

As a task force appointed by the Executive Council of the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI), we investigated the clinical use of contingent electric skin shock (CESS) in behavior analytic treatments for severe problem behavior. We studied how CESS is used in contemporary behavior analysis, reinforcement-based alternatives to CESS, and current ethical and professional guidelines for applied behavior analysts. We recommended that ABAI uphold clients' right to receive CESS when it is restricted to extreme cases and used under rigorous professional and legal oversight.

Rich-lean transitions produced by stimuli associated with accurate and inaccurate responding by pigeons.

Discriminable transitions from relatively favorable schedules of reinforcement to unfavorable schedules (rich-lean transitions) can produce disruptions in operant behavior. A prior evaluation in our laboratory (Toegel et al., 2021) found that placing a border around a key displayed on a resistive touchscreen increased pigeons' response accuracy relative to conditions without the border.

The aversiveness of timeout from response-dependent and response-independent food deliveries as a function of delivery rate.

Seven experiments with rats assessed the aversiveness of timeout using punishment and avoidance procedures. Experiments 1 and 2 considered the contributions of stimulus change, suspending the response-reinforcer contingency, response prevention, the general disruption in the reinforcement schedule during time-in, and overall decreases in reinforcement. Results support the conclusion that response-contingent timeouts punish behavior because they are signaled periods during which an ongoing schedule of positive reinforcement is suspended.

Effects of advance notice on transition-related pausing in pigeons.

Transitions between tasks can produce behavioral disruptions that are characterized as problematic. Advance notice, a procedure designed to reduce disruptions, involves presenting a stimulus to warn of the end of the ongoing activity and the nature of the upcoming activity. Clinical evaluations of advance notice have produced mixed results.

Design and evaluation of a touchscreen apparatus for operant research with pigeons.

We developed a touchscreen apparatus for pigeons and conducted a series of experiments that assessed its utility for free-operant procedures. The apparatus incorporated an on-board Windows computer, an electromechanical interface, an amplified speaker, and the touchscreen. We found that merely projecting a virtual key on the screen was insufficient; too many pecks missed the key.

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Replication Failures.

Worries about the reproducibility of experiments in the behavioral and social sciences arise from evidence that many published reports contain false positive results. Misunderstanding and misuse of statistical procedures are key sources of false positives. In behavior analysis, however, statistical procedures have not been used much.

Behavioral functions of stimuli signaling transitions across rich and lean schedules of reinforcement.

On multiple fixed-ratio schedules, pausing is extended at the start of a component ending in a small reinforcer (a lean component) but only when this component follows a component ending in a large reinforcer (a rich component). In two experiments, we assessed whether a stimulus correlated with a lean component is aversive and how its function is affected by the preceding component. In Experiment 1, pigeons responded on mixed fixed-ratio schedules ending in large or small reinforcers.

Suppressive and facilitative effects of shock intensity and interresponse times followed by shock.

Although response-dependent shock often suppresses responding, response facilitation can occur. In two experiments, we examined the suppressive and facilitative effects of shock by manipulating shock intensity and the interresponse times that produced shock. Rats' lever presses were reinforced on a variable-interval 40-s schedule of food presentation.

Assessing the role of effort reduction in the reinforcing efficacy of timeout from avoidance.

Rats responded on concurrent schedules of shock-postponement or deletion (avoidance) and timeout from avoidance. In Experiment 1, 3 rats' responses on one lever postponed shocks for 20 s and responses on a second lever produced a 1-min timeout according to a variable-interval 45-s schedule. Across conditions, a warning signal (white noise) was presented 19.

Extended pausing by humans on multiple fixed-ratio schedules with varied reinforcer magnitude and response requirements.

We conducted three experiments to reproduce and extend Perone and Courtney's (1992) study of pausing at the beginning of fixed-ratio schedules. In a multiple schedule with unequal amounts of food across two components, they found that pigeons paused longest in the component associated with the smaller amount of food (the lean component), but only when it was preceded by the rich component. In our studies, adults with mild intellectual disabilities responded on a touch-sensitive computer monitor to produce money.

Effects of past and upcoming response-force requirements on fixed-ratio pausing.

Four rats obtained food by pressing a lever 30 times in each component of a two-component multiple schedule. Across conditions, the force required to press the lever was increased in one component and held constant in the other. Pausing at the outset of each component was controlled by both the past and upcoming force requirements: Pauses were longer when the upcoming requirement was high and this effect was intensified when the past requirement was low.

Effects of alternative reinforcement on human behavior: the source does matter.

Competing theories regarding the effects of delivering periodic response-independent reinforcement (more accurately, response-independent points exchanged for money) on a baseline rate of behavior were evaluated in human subjects. Contiguity theory holds that these events decrease target responding because incompatible behavior is adventitiously strengthened when the point deliveries follow target behavior closely in time. Matching theory holds that response-independent points, like any other alternative reinforcer, should reduce target responding.

Negative effects of positive reinforcement.

Procedures classified as positive reinforcement are generally regarded as more desirable than those classified as aversive-those that involve negative reinforcement or punishment. This is a crude test of the desirability of a procedure to change or maintain behavior. The problems can be identified on the basis of theory, experimental analysis, and consideration of practical cases.