Background: Retinal detachment is an ocular emergency posing diagnostic difficulty for the emergency practitioner. Direct fundoscopy and visual field testing are difficult to perform and do not completely rule out retinal detachment. Ophthalmologists use ocular ultrasound to enhance their clinical acumen in detecting retinal detachments (RD), and bedside ultrasound capability is readily available to many emergency practitioners (EP).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIt is a common practice to routinely obtain x-rays before clinical evaluation and cleaning of glass-caused wounds to assess for possible retained foreign bodies (FBs). [Am J Surg 1982;144(July):63-5; Ann Emerg Med 1983;12(July):434-7; Emerg Med Clin NorthAm 1985;3(2):383-91; Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992;10:163-77; Ann Emerg Med 1988 17(12):125-34; Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992;10(4):757-79] This prospective study was designed to question whether routine x-rays are necessary for all patients with glass-caused wounds. Plain films were taken before clinical exam but not reviewed until after the exam was completed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: To compare the effectivenesses of three phenytoin-loading techniques.
Methods: Patients with subtherapeutic phenytoin concentrations who presented within 48 hours of a seizure were randomized to receive either 20 mg/kg of oral phenytoin (PO), divided in maximum doses of 400 mg every two hours, 18 mg/kg of intravenous phenytoin (IVP) at an initial infusion rate of 50 mg/min, or 18 mg/kg (phenytoin equivalents) of intravenous fosphenytoin (IVF) at an initial infusion rate of 150 mg/min.
Results: A total of 45 patients were enrolled: 16 in the PO group, 14 in the IVP group, and 15 in the IVF group.
Study Objective: Oral phenytoin, intravenous phenytoin, and intravenous fosphenytoin are all commonly used for loading phenytoin in the emergency department (ED). The cost-effectiveness of each was compared for patients presenting with seizures and subtherapeutic phenytoin concentrations.
Methods: A simple decision tree was developed to determine the treatment costs associated with each of 3 loading techniques.
The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effectiveness of intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous meperidine and diazepam during the reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations. Patients were randomized to one of the two methods before the reduction of shoulder dislocations. Patients marked a visual analog pain scale at baseline, after anesthesia just before reduction, and at the time of discharge.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF