Background: Recent studies have validated the efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an alternative diagnostic imaging approach to computed tomography (CT) for patients with suspected acute diverticulitis. This study aimed to quantify the national impact of this approach in cost savings, ED length-of-stay (LOS), and radiation risk mitigation using a POCUS-first approach for acute diverticulitis in the emergency department (ED).
Methods: Using published data, we constructed a Monte Carlo simulation model to compare two POCUS-first strategies (nonselective and selective approaches) for evaluating patients with suspected acute diverticulitis in the ED.
Purpose: While there are many benefits to radiation oncology services, there can be emotional burdens in the care of patients with advanced cancer. Burnout is a prevalent problem in oncology. Existing literature suggests refocusing attention on providers' sense of purpose to protect against burnout.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is the gold standard for nephrolithiasis evaluation in the emergency department (ED). However, Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend against ordering NCCT for patients with suspected nephrolithiasis who are <50 years old with a history of kidney stones. Our primary objective was to estimate the national annual cost savings from using a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)-first approach for patients with suspected nephrolithiasis meeting Choosing Wisely criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Dental abscesses are a common reason patients present to the emergency department (ED). Facial and dental imaging are sometimes necessary to support the clinical diagnosis. While radiographs and computed tomography scans are frequently used, point-of-care ultrasound (US) offers several advantages, including decreased radiation exposure, reduced costs, and shorter patient length of stay.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF