Asymmetric sample shapes complicate planar biaxial testing assumptions by intensifying shear strains and stresses.

Planar biaxial testing offers a physiologically relevant approach for mechanically characterizing thin deformable soft tissues, but often relies on erroneous assumptions of uniform strain fields and negligible shear strains and forces. In addition to the complex mechanical behavior exhibited by soft tissues, constraints on sample size, geometry, and aspect ratio often restrict sample shape and symmetry. Using simple PDMS gels, we explored the unknown and unquantified effects of sample shape asymmetry on planar biaxial testing results, including shear strain magnitudes, shear forces measured at the sample's boundary, and the homogeneity of strains experienced at the center of each sample.