A comparison of 2 distal attachment mucosal exposure devices: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.

Background And Aims: Endocuff (Arc Medical Design, Leeds, UK) and Endocuff Vision (Arc Medical Design, Leeds, UK) are effective mucosal exposure devices for improving polyp detection during colonoscopy. AmplifEYE (Medivators Inc, Minneapolis, Minn, USA) is a device that appears similar to the Endocuff devices but has received minimal clinical testing.

Methods: We performed a randomized controlled clinical trial using a noninferiority design to compare Endocuff Vision with AmplifEYE.

Impact of a ring-fitted cap on insertion time and adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial.

Background And Aims: Devices for flattening colon folds can improve polyp detection at colonoscopy. However, there are few data on the endoscopic ring-fitted cap (EndoRings; EndoAid, Caesarea, Israel). We sought to compare adenoma detection with EndoRings with that of standard high-definition colonoscopy.

SIC-8000 versus hetastarch as a submucosal injection fluid for EMR: a randomized controlled trial.

Background And Aims: Viscous solutions provide a superior submucosal cushion for EMR. SIC-8000 (Eleview; Aries Pharmaceuticals, La Jolla, Calif) is a commercially available U.S.