Purpose: To evaluate the retention of zirconia crowns on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments using different luting agents, with and without PEEK primer.
Materials And Methods: A total of 100 PEEK abutment replicas were fabricated, airborne particle-abraded with aluminum oxide, and divided into four groups (n = 25). A total of 100 zirconia crowns were fabricated and cemented using either adhesive resin cement or self-adhesive resin cement with and without PEEK primer; thus, the groups were: group AA-P (adhesive cement with primer); group AA-N (adhesive cement without primer); group SA-P (self-adhesive cement with primer); and group SA-N (self-adhesive cement without primer).
Statement Of Problem: Titanium-supported polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments provide an economic alternative to zirconia abutments in esthetically important areas. Research comparing the performance regarding esthetics, longevity, and biologic parameters of PEEK abutments is lacking.
Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to determine whether PEEK implant abutments provide similar esthetic and biologic parameters and survival rates as zirconia implant abutments.