https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&term=Mathew+Schafer%5Bauthor%5D&datetype=edat&usehistory=y&retmax=1&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&WebEnv=MCID_67957a127af3b45ee901dadd&query_key=1&retmode=xml&retstart=-10&retmax=25&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908
While allowing for rapid recruitment of large samples, online psychiatric and neurodevelopmental research relies heavily on participants' self-report of neuropsychiatric symptoms, foregoing the rigorous clinical characterization of laboratory settings. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) research is one example where the clinical validity of such an approach remains elusive. Here, we compared participants characterized online via self-reports against in-person participants evaluated by clinicians.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF