Publications by authors named "Masanobu Itano"

Purpose: This report covers the first multi-institutional study of independent monitor unit (MU)/dose calculation verification for the CyberKnife, Vero4DRT, and TomoTherapy radiotherapy delivery systems.

Methods: A total of 973 clinical treatment plans were collected from 12 institutions. Commercial software employing the Clarkson algorithm was used for verification after a measurement validation study, and the doses from the treatment planning systems (TPSs) and verification programs were compared on the basis of the mean value ± two standard deviations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A multi-institutional study was conducted to confirm the feasibility of using 3-5% action levels for independent monitor unit (MU) verification across 12 institutions, analyzing a total of 5936 fields.
  • The results showed that the mean verification difference was 1.0 ± 3.6%, but larger discrepancies were noted specifically in breast and lung treatments, highlighting the need for careful analysis.
  • It concluded that while the 5% action level is usable, clinicians must pay attention to the significant variations found in breast and lung treatment plans, especially related to field shape and reference point placements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: A multi-institutional study was performed to identify the impact of different independent dose verification programs on independent dose verification software program.

Methods: Data for 1,543 treatment fields were collected in three institutions. RADCALC and Simple MU Analysis (Simple MU) using the Clarkson-based algorithm were used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Researchers conducted a multi-institutional investigation into the precision of independent dose verifications using a wedge off-axis calculation and found improved agreement with treatment planning systems.
  • * Results indicated that using the wedge off-axis calculation led to better confidence limits (around 2% for both physical and non-physical wedges) compared to over 5% without it, suggesting a tolerance level of 5% for these plans similar to conventional techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF