Lesion size measurement in femoral head necrosis.

Background: Management of patients with early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head remains controversial. Uniform use of an effective method of evaluation and classification, including both stage and lesion size, would allow for comparison and would significantly improve treatment of patients. There is no consensus on how best to determine lesion size.

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: diagnosis and classification systems.

Osteonecrosis of femoral head is a rare but disabling condition that usually results in progressive femoral head collapse and secondary arthritis necessitating total hip arthroplasty if not treated appropriately in early stages. However, early diagnosis is challenging as the onset of disease is insidious and the symptoms and signs are usually minimal and nonspecific until it becomes advanced. Of several diagnostic modalities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the imaging method of choice with the highest sensitivity and specificity, while detection of potential risk factors is very important as well.

Are we evaluating osteonecrosis adequately?

Purpose: It is well recognised that to evaluate a patient with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) adequately, it is necessary that the size of the infarct and the extent of femoral head joint involvement be indicated, in addition to the type or stage of the pathological process. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with ONFH are being evaluated adequately in studies published during the past 25 years and to see if any trends can be identified.

Methods: Articles describing treatment of patients with ONFH, published between 1985 and 2011, were reviewed to determine the methods used to indicate the type and extent of pathology present on radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies.

A comparison between total hip replacement for osteonecrosis and degenerative joint disease.

There has been some reluctance to perform total hip replacement on younger patients with osteonecrosis because of the poor results reported in the earlier literature. To determine the extent to which advances in surgical technique and prosthesis design have led to improved results, we evaluated 203 total hip replacements performed for osteonecrosis and compared them to 300 performed for degenerative joint disease. The failure rate for all femoral and acetabular components combined was 3.

Determining lesion size in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Background: Several studies have documented that the size of the osteonecrotic lesion in the femoral head is an essential parameter in determining prognosis and treatment. There are several methods currently available to measure lesion size, but no general agreement as to which is most useful. In the present study, three different radiographic methods for determining lesion size were evaluated and compared.

Systematic analysis of classification systems for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Background: Multiple classification systems for osteonecrosis of the hip have been developed to assist physicians in the diagnosis and treatment of this potentially debilitating disorder. The purpose of this analysis was to delineate the classification systems utilized in reports published since 1985 and, through a comparison of the most commonly used systems, to identify consistent factors that would allow for cross-publication comparisons to be made.

Methods: We performed a PubMed search for reports of outcome studies concerning treatment methods for osteonecrosis of the hip.

Bilateral core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Unlabelled: Early treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head yields better results than late treatment. Because osteonecrosis frequently is bilateral, it often is advisable to treat both hips simultaneously. Core decompression is one of the more common methods of treatment; however the safety of doing simultaneous bilateral core decompression has been questioned.

Does pain predict outcome in hips with osteonecrosis?

It generally is accepted that without specific treatment 70-80% of hips with clinically diagnosed osteonecrosis will progress to collapse. However, there are conflicting reports regarding the relationship between pain and outcome before femoral head collapse. Some surgeons are reluctant to operate on patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic hips, assuming that these patients have a better prognosis than patients with pain.

Classification systems for osteonecrosis: an overview.

Currently a number of classification systems for osteonecrosis are in use. The use of different systems often leads to confusion and makes it difficult to compare the results of different methods of treatment. Because the management of osteonecrosis is determined in large part by the stage of the disease, it is important to use an effective and reliable method of staging and classification.

Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Background: In an effort to decrease the rate of aseptic loosening, certain cemented femoral components were designed to have a roughened or textured surface with a methylmethacrylate precoating. Reports differ as to whether this step has increased or decreased the rate of failure. This study was designed to evaluate this issue.