Background: International evidence on the outcome of generalist versus specialist palliative care provision in palliative care trajectories is limited and varied. In general, intervention studies can influence the organisation of palliative care practice and professional collaborations. However, randomised clinical trials in palliative care rarely consider the organisational significance of the studies, as experienced by the professionals involved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Creating coordination and concerted action between sectors of modern healthcare is an inherent challenge, and decision makers in search for solutions tend replicate new models across countries and settings. An example of this is the translation of the North West London integrated care pilot into a large-scale trial that took place in the Danish Municipality of Odense from 2013-2016. This article highlights the findings from our evaluation of the ill-fated project and discusses lessons learned.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntegrated care programmes for patients with type 2 diabetes can be successfully implemented by planning the programmes in coordination between the sectors primary care, community settings and diabetes outpatient clinic, and with involvement of leaders and employees. Our project has resulted in: 1) more patients with type 2 diabetes receiving diabetes management courses, 2) improved diabetes management of primary care, and 3) improved confidence and respect between sectors involved in diabetes care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Department of Cardiology, Lillebælt Hospital, Vejle, has implemented a development and implementation project on the gradient of the inter-sectoral coordination of rehabilitation for patients in chronic heart disease courses conducted in cooperation with the Municipal Health Centre, Denmark. The project was financed by the Region of South Denmark through the Danish Health and Medicines Authority. Implementation of a nurse hospital-based case manager is shown through the project to reduce dropout and opt-outs under the sectoral transition significantly.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The Maturity Matrix (MM) comprises a formative evaluation instrument for primary care practices to self-assess their degree of organisational development in a group setting, guided by an external facilitator. The practice teams discuss organisational development, score their own performance and set improvement goals for the following year. The objective of this project was to introduce a translated and culturally adapted version of the MM in Denmark, to test its feasibility, to promote and document organisational change in general practices and to analyse associations between the recorded change(s) and structural factors in practices and the factors associated with the MM process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The Maturity Matrix is a group-based formative self-evaluation tool aimed at assessing the degree of organisational development in general practice and providing a starting point for local quality improvement. Earlier studies of the Maturity Matrix have shown that participants find the method a useful way of assessing their practice's organisational development. However, little is known about participants' views on the resulting efforts to implement intended changes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: This paper aims to evaluate the maturity matrix (MM) a facilitated formative self-assessment tool for organisational development in primary care) on satisfaction, differences between GP and staff, the extent to which practice teams worked on goals set, and to identify suggestions for change to MM.
Design/methodology/approach: The approach taken was a cross-sectional survey administered to all participants by mail in 57 family practices, 278 participants, (143 GPs; 135 staff) in Denmark, one year after participating in the MM project.
Findings: At practice level 44 returned at least one questionnaire.