Systematic differences in visual working memory performance are not caused by differences in working memory storage.

People vary in their performance on visual working memory tasks, and these individual differences covary with a wide range of higher-level cognitive processes including fluid intelligence. Performance also varies across study displays, purportedly driven by both low- and higher-level processes. Understanding what causes these sources of systematic variability has been crucial for developing theories of working memory.

Local motion pooling is continuous, global motion perception is discrete.

Perceiving the motion of an object is thought to involve two stages: Local motion energy is measured at each point in space, and these signals are then pooled across space to build coherent global motion. There are several theories of how local-to-global pooling occurs, but they all predict that global motion perception is a continuous process, such that increasing the strength of motion energy should gradually increase the precision of perceived motion directions. We test this prediction against the alternative that global motion perception is discrete: Motion is either perceived with high precision or fails to be perceived altogether.

Stroop interference in a delayed match-to-sample task: evidence for semantic competition.

Discussions of the source of the Stroop interference effect continue to pervade the literature. Semantic competition posits that interference results from competing semantic activation of word and color dimensions of the stimulus prior to response selection. Response competition posits that interference results from competing responses for articulating the word dimension vs.

More than a feeling: incidental learning of array geometry by blindfolded adult humans revealed through touch.

View-based matching theories of orientation suggest that mobile organisms encode a visual memory consisting of a visual panorama from a target location and maneuver to reduce discrepancy between current visual perception and this stored visual memory to return to a location. Recent success of such theories to explain the orientation behavior of insects and birds raises questions regarding the extent to which such an explanation generalizes to other species. In the present study, we attempted to determine the extent to which such view-based matching theories may explain the orientation behavior of a mammalian species (in this case adult humans).