Background: Technological advances in sequencing and computation have allowed deep exploration of the molecular basis of diseases. Biological networks have proven to be a useful framework for interrogating omics data and modeling regulatory gene and protein interactions. Large collaborative projects, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), have provided a rich resource for building and validating new computational methods resulting in a plethora of open-source software for downloading, pre-processing, and analyzing those data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThere is increasing recognition that the sex chromosomes, X and Y, play an important role in health and disease that goes beyond the determination of biological sex. Loss of the Y chromosome (LOY) in blood, which occurs naturally in aging men, has been found to be a driver of cardiac fibrosis and heart failure mortality. LOY also occurs in most solid tumors in males and is often associated with worse survival, suggesting that LOY may give tumor cells a growth or survival advantage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdvances in omics technologies have allowed spatially resolved molecular profiling of single cells, providing a window not only into the diversity and distribution of cell types within a tissue, but also into the effects of interactions between cells in shaping the transcriptional landscape. Cells send chemical and mechanical signals which are received by other cells, where they can subsequently initiate context-specific gene regulatory responses. These interactions and their responses shape the individual molecular phenotype of a cell in a given microenvironment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMotivation: Systems biology analyses often use correlations in gene expression profiles to infer co-expression networks that are then used as input for gene regulatory network inference or to identify functional modules of co-expressed or putatively co-regulated genes. While systematic biases, including batch effects, are known to induce spurious associations and confound differential gene expression analyses (DE), the impact of batch effects on gene co-expression has not been fully explored. Methods have been developed to adjust expression values, ensuring conditional independence of mean and variance from batch or other covariates for each gene, resulting in improved fidelity of DE analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGene regulatory networks (GRNs) are effective tools for inferring complex interactions between molecules that regulate biological processes and hence can provide insights into drivers of biological systems. Inferring coexpression networks is a critical element of GRN inference, as the correlation between expression patterns may indicate that genes are coregulated by common factors. However, methods that estimate coexpression networks generally derive an aggregate network representing the mean regulatory properties of the population and so fail to fully capture population heterogeneity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has been observed to have significant sex differences in incidence, prognosis, and response to therapy. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for these disparities have not been investigated extensively.
Methods: Sample-specific gene regulatory network methods were used to analyze RNA sequencing data from non-cancerous human lung samples from The Genotype Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) and lung adenocarcinoma primary tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA); results were validated on independent data.
Aging is the primary risk factor for many individual cancer types, including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). To understand how aging-related alterations in the regulation of key cellular processes might affect LUAD risk and survival outcomes, we built individual (person)-specific gene regulatory networks integrating gene expression, transcription factor protein-protein interaction, and sequence motif data, using PANDA/LIONESS algorithms, for both non-cancerous lung tissue samples from the Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx) project and LUAD samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). In GTEx, we found that pathways involved in cell proliferation and immune response are increasingly targeted by regulatory transcription factors with age; these aging-associated alterations are accelerated by tobacco smoking and resemble oncogenic shifts in the regulatory landscape observed in LUAD and suggests that dysregulation of aging pathways might be associated with an increased risk of LUAD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGene regulatory networks (GRNs) are effective tools for inferring complex interactions between molecules that regulate biological processes and hence can provide insights into drivers of biological systems. Inferring co-expression networks is a critical element of GRN inference as the correlation between expression patterns may indicate that genes are coregulated by common factors. However, methods that estimate co-expression networks generally derive an aggregate network representing the mean regulatory properties of the population and so fail to fully capture population heterogeneity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has been observed to have significant sex differences in incidence, prognosis, and response to therapy. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for these disparities have not been investigated extensively. Sample-specific gene regulatory network methods were used to analyze RNA sequencing data from non-cancerous human lung samples from The Genotype Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) and lung adenocarcinoma primary tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA); results were validated on independent data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInference and analysis of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) require software that integrates multi-omic data from various sources. The Network Zoo (netZoo; netzoo.github.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe increasing quantity of multi-omic data, such as methylomic and transcriptomic profiles collected on the same specimen or even on the same cell, provides a unique opportunity to explore the complex interactions that define cell phenotype and govern cellular responses to perturbations. We propose a network approach based on Gaussian Graphical Models (GGMs) that facilitates the joint analysis of paired omics data. This method, called DRAGON (Determining Regulatory Associations using Graphical models on multi-Omic Networks), calibrates its parameters to achieve an optimal trade-off between the network's complexity and estimation accuracy, while explicitly accounting for the characteristics of each of the assessed omics 'layers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnderstanding how each person's unique genotype influences their individual patterns of gene regulation has the potential to improve our understanding of human health and development, and to refine genotype-specific disease risk assessments and treatments. However, the effects of genetic variants are not typically considered when constructing gene regulatory networks, despite the fact that many disease-associated genetic variants are thought to have regulatory effects, including the disruption of transcription factor (TF) binding. We developed EGRET (Estimating the Genetic Regulatory Effect on TFs), which infers a genotype-specific gene regulatory network for each individual in a study population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGene regulatory network inference allows for the modeling of genome-scale regulatory processes that are altered during development, in disease, and in response to perturbations. Our group has developed a collection of tools to model various regulatory processes, including transcriptional (PANDA, SPIDER) and post-transcriptional (PUMA) gene regulation, as well as gene regulation in individual samples (LIONESS). These methods work by postulating a network structure and then optimizing that structure to be consistent with multiple lines of biological evidence through repeated operations on data matrices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAfter emerging in China in late 2019, the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread worldwide, and as of mid-2021, it remains a significant threat globally. Only a few coronaviruses are known to infect humans, and only two cause infections similar in severity to SARS-CoV-2: , a species closely related to SARS-CoV-2 that emerged in 2002, and , which emerged in 2012. Unlike the current pandemic, previous epidemics were controlled rapidly through public health measures, but the body of research investigating severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome has proven valuable for identifying approaches to treating and preventing novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc AAAI Conf Artif Intell
February 2021
Bipartite network inference is a ubiquitous problem across disciplines. One important example in the field molecular biology is gene regulatory network inference. Gene regulatory networks are an instrumental tool aiding in the discovery of the molecular mechanisms driving diverse diseases, including cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which emerged in late 2019, has since spread around the world and infected hundreds of millions of people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While this viral species was unknown prior to January 2020, its similarity to other coronaviruses that infect humans has allowed for rapid insight into the mechanisms that it uses to infect human hosts, as well as the ways in which the human immune system can respond. Here, we contextualize SARS-CoV-2 among other coronaviruses and identify what is known and what can be inferred about its behavior once inside a human host.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGene regulation plays a fundamental role in shaping tissue identity, function, and response to perturbation. Regulatory processes are controlled by complex networks of interacting elements, including transcription factors, miRNAs and their target genes. The structure of these networks helps to determine phenotypes and can ultimately influence the development of disease or response to therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGlioblastoma is an aggressive cancer of the brain and spine. While analysis of glioblastoma 'omics data has somewhat improved our understanding of the disease, it has not led to direct improvement in patient survival. Cancer survival is often characterized by differences in gene expression, but the mechanisms that drive these differences are generally unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProfiling of whole transcriptomes has become a cornerstone of molecular biology and an invaluable tool for the characterization of clinical phenotypes and the identification of disease subtypes. Analyses of these data are becoming ever more sophisticated as we move beyond simple comparisons to consider networks of higher-order interactions and associations. Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) model the regulatory relationships of transcription factors and genes and have allowed the identification of differentially regulated processes in disease systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFType 1 diabetes (T1D) mellitus is a systemic disease triggered by a local autoimmune inflammatory reaction in insulin-producing cells that induce organ-wide, long-term metabolic effects. Mathematical modeling of the whole-body regulatory bihormonal system has helped to identify therapeutic interventions but is limited to a coarse-grained representation of metabolism. To extend the depiction of T1D, we developed a whole-body model of organ-specific regulation and metabolism that highlighted chronic inflammation as a hallmark of the disease, identified processes related to neurodegenerative disorders and suggested calcium channel blockers as adjuvants for diabetes control.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAfter emerging in China in late 2019, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 spread worldwide and as of mid-2021 remains a significant threat globally. Only a few coronaviruses are known to infect humans, and only two cause infections similar in severity to SARS-CoV-2: , a closely related species of SARS-CoV-2 that emerged in 2002, and , which emerged in 2012. Unlike the current pandemic, previous epidemics were controlled rapidly through public health measures, but the body of research investigating severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome has proven valuable for identifying approaches to treating and preventing novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which emerged in late 2019, has since spread around the world and infected hundreds of millions of people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While this viral species was unknown prior to January 2020, its similarity to other coronaviruses that infect humans has allowed for rapid insight into the mechanisms that it uses to infect human hosts, as well as the ways in which the human immune system can respond. Here, we contextualize SARS-CoV-2 among other coronaviruses and identify what is known and what can be inferred about its behavior once inside a human host.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Bioinformatics
September 2020
Background: Genome-scale metabolic models are increasingly employed to predict the phenotype of various biological systems pertaining to healthcare and bioengineering. To characterize the full metabolic spectrum of such systems, Fast Flux Variability Analysis (FFVA) is commonly used in parallel with static load balancing. This approach assigns to each core an equal number of biochemical reactions without consideration of their solution complexity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF