Range of Motion Following Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparing Active Flexion and Extension With Passive Flexion Using Rubber Bands Followed by Active Extension.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the outcome in terms of range of motion between early active flexion and extension (early active motion, [EAM]) and passive flexion using rubber bands followed by active extension (sometimes referred to as a Kleinert regimen) after flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2.

Methods: Data were collected from the Swedish national health care registry for hand surgery (HAKIR). Rehabilitation regimens were decided by the preference of each caregiver.

Rehabilitation following flexor tendon injury in Zone 2: a randomized controlled study.

The aim of this study was to compare an early active motion (EAM) regimen to a modified Kleinert passive motion therapy in Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries with regards to range of motion (ROM), grip strength and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Seventy-two patients were included. At 3 months postoperatively, we found no difference in total active motion (TAM) between the EAM and the Kleinert groups (median 195.

Patient-reported outcome measures and their association to the original Strickland classification after flexor tendon repair.

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the original Strickland classification after flexor tendon injuries in Zones 1 and 2. Data were collected from the Swedish national health care registry for hand surgery (HAKIR). The studied PROMs were the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and the patient questionnaire from the HAKIR (HQ-8).