Publications by authors named "Mark Ratain"

Background: Gene signatures derived from transcriptomic-causal networks offer potential for tailoring clinical care in cancer treatment by identifying predictive and prognostic biomarkers. This study aimed to uncover such signatures in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to aid treatment decisions.

Methods: We constructed transcriptomic-causal networks and integrated gene interconnectivity into overall survival (OS) analysis to control for confounding genes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cancer patients frequently suffer from pain, often managed with opioids. However, undertreated pain remains a significant concern. Opioid effectiveness varies due to genetic differences in how individuals metabolize some of these medications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Current treatment options are limited by the expectation that alternative therapies must be proven "non-inferior" to existing ones, making trials expensive and complex.
  • Non-inferiority trials often overlook important factors like variability in treatment outcomes and place excessive burdens of proof on alternatives, especially in terms of toxicity and cost.
  • The authors suggest moving away from labeling trials as superiority or non-inferiority, advocating instead for a simpler description of trials as "comparative" to promote better patient-centered treatment options.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Herein, we report results from a genome-wide study conducted to identify protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) for circulating angiogenic and inflammatory protein markers in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study was conducted using genotype, protein marker, and baseline clinical and demographic data from CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance), a randomized phase III study designed to assess outcomes of adding VEGF or EGFR inhibitors to systemic chemotherapy in mCRC patients. Germline DNA derived from blood was genotyped on whole-genome array platforms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article reviews the implementation challenges to the American Society of Clinical Oncology's ethical framework for including research biopsies in oncology clinical trials. The primary challenges to implementation relate to the definitions of secondary endpoints, the scientific and regulatory framework, and the incentive structure that encourages inclusion of biopsies. Principles of research stewardship require that the clinical trials community correctly articulate the scientific goals of any research biopsies, especially those that are required for the patient to enroll on a trial and receive an investigational agent.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The objective of this study was to discover clinical and pharmacogenetic factors associated with bevacizumab-related gastrointestinal hemorrhage in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance) 90401. Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer received docetaxel and prednisone ± bevacizumab. Patients were genotyped using Illumina HumanHap610-Quad and assessed using cause-specific risk for association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study focused on identifying gene interconnectivity, specifically in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), to improve patient treatment by linking gene networks to overall survival (OS) outcomes.
  • Researchers analyzed data from 1,165 patients in a clinical trial comparing treatments with cetuximab and bevacizumab, discovering gene signatures that predict patient survival based on specific treatments.
  • The identified gene signatures not only showed downregulation in CRC tumors compared to normal tissue but also highlighted proteins that interact functionally, indicating their potential as novel biomarkers for personalized cancer treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Since the middle of the 20th century, oncology's dose-finding paradigm has been oriented toward identifying a drug's maximum tolerated dose, which is then carried forward into phase 2 and 3 trials and clinical practice. For most modern precision medicines, however, maximum tolerated dose is far greater than the minimum dose needed to achieve maximal benefit, leading to unnecessary side effects. Regulatory change may decrease maximum tolerated dose's predominance by enforcing dose optimization of drugs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study identified protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) related to angiogenic and inflammatory proteins in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using genetic and protein data from a large clinical trial.
  • The analysis revealed a new pQTL associated with TGF-2 protein levels, validated in additional cancer patient datasets, and confirmed previously reported associations with VEGF-A and other protein markers.
  • The findings enhance our understanding of how genetic variants influence protein levels in mCRC, potentially guiding future cancer treatments and research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Policy changes are needed to ensure that Cooperative Research and Development Agreements and patent applications filed by the US National Institutes of Health are aligned with the interests of the American public.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dose optimisation is increasingly important in oncology, as exemplified by the US Food and Drug Administration's Project Optimus initiative, which is aligned with similar initiatives in other countries. In parallel, multiple stakeholders have raised concerns about anticancer drug prices, affordability, and access. This is of particular concern to government payers as well as patients and physicians in low- and middle-income countries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for the treatment of a variety of cancer types. The doses of these drugs, though approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have never been optimised, likely leading to significantly higher doses than required for optimal efficacy. Dose optimisation would hypothetically decrease the risk, severity, and duration of immune-related adverse events, as well as provide an opportunity to reduce costs through interventional pharmacoeconomic strategies such as off-label dose reductions or less frequent dosing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Cancer care-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions harm human health. Many cancer drugs are administered at greater-than-necessary doses, frequencies, and durations. Alternative dosing strategies may enable reductions in cancer care GHG emissions without compromising patient outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Pharmacogenomics plays a vital role in personalized medicine but is rarely implemented in hospitals, prompting a collaborative project in Chicago to integrate it into inpatient care.
  • The study focused on enrolling African American adult patients for preemptive genotyping to predict drug responses or toxicity across three hospitals.
  • Challenges faced included engaging hospital staff and adapting workflows, with strategies like streamlined information delivery and leveraging champions among healthcare providers to enhance adoption of pharmacogenomic practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Atezolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), was initially approved in 2016, around the same time that the sponsor published the minimum serum concentration to maintain the saturation of receptor occupancy (6 μg/mL). The initially approved dose regimen of 1200 mg every 3 weeks (q3w) was subsequently modified to 840 mg q2w or 1680 mg q4w through pharmacokinetic simulations. Yet, each standard regimen yields steady-state trough concentrations (C ) far exceeding (≈ 40-fold) the stated target concentration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Research biopsies included in cancer clinical trials have the goal of advancing scientific understanding of the biological bases of cancer and its treatments, but may offer no prospect of direct benefit to participants and often pose more than minimal risk. The research community is examining the ethics of research biopsies increasingly often, especially when they are mandatory for study participation but do not support primary study objectives and thus are "nonintegral" to the study. Ethical concerns center on the limited scientific justification supporting some biopsies, risks to research participants, and the potential for coercion and therapeutic misconception during the informed consent process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF