Comparison of a contrast-to-noise ratio-driven exposure control and a regular detector dose-driven exposure control in abdominal imaging in a clinical angiography system.

Purpose: The first purpose of this phantom study was to verify whether a contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)-driven exposure control (CEC) can maintain target CNR in angiography more precisely compared to a conventional detector dose-driven exposure control (DEC). The second purpose was to estimate the difference between incident air kerma produced by CEC and DEC when both exposure controls reach the same CNR.

Methods: A standardized 3D-printed phantom with an iron foil and a cavity, filled with iodinated contrast material, was developed to measure CNR using different image acquisition settings.

Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography.

Conventional detector-dose driven exposure controls (DEC) do not consider the contrasting material of interest in angiography. Considering the latter when choosing the acquisition parameters should allow for optimization of x-ray quality and consecutively lead to a substantial reduction of radiation exposure. Therefore, the impact of a material-specific, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) driven exposure control (CEC) compared to DEC on radiation exposure was investigated.