Publications by authors named "Marialena Prapa"

Research Question: Are there any differences in viability, spindle abnormalities and mitochondrial and other organelle structures amongst embryos biopsied on day 3 versus day 5 before and after vitrification?

Design: A total of 240 day 3 biopsied embryos that developed to blastocysts but were rejected for transfer following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects (PGT-M) (n = 115) or for aneuploidies (PGT-A) (n = 125) were divided into two groups: (i) 120 blastocysts treated for viability, spindle/chromosome configuration (SCC) analysis and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis (fresh n = 20, n = 20, n = 20 and following vitrification/warming n = 20, n = 20, n = 20); (ii) 120 embryos were re-biopsied at the blastocyst stage and treated for viability, SCC and TEM analysis (fresh n = 20, n = 20, n = 20 and following vitrification/warming n = 20, n = 20, n = 20). Also, 60 vitrified blastocysts biopsied only on day 5 that were rejected for transfer following PGT-M (n = 6) or PGT-A (n = 54) were treated following warming for viability (n = 20), SCC (n = 20) and TEM analysis (n = 20).

Results: No differences were observed in SCC and ultrastructure between embryos biopsied on day 5 and day 3 but following vitrification higher numbers of abnormal spindles, distension of mitochondria, multivesicular bodies, lipofuscin droplets, altered cell junctions and occasionally excessive accumulation of glycogen granules were evident.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Research Question: Are there any differences in viability and ultrastructure amongst embryos biopsied on Day 5 versus Day 3 following vitrification in open and closed systems and compared to fresh embryos?

Design: One hundred human embryos (40 blastocysts biopsied on Day 5 and subsequently vitrified in open or closed systems and 60 Day 3 biopsied embryos that developed to blastocysts but were rejected for transfer following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects and for aneuploidies were either treated fresh [n = 20] or vitrified [n = 40] in open or closed systems) and following warming and culture for 4 h were subjected to viability staining with carboxyfluorescein-diacetate succinimidylester/propidium iodide or processed for transmission electron microscopy.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the viability of human biopsied embryos following vitrification in open and closed systems. Compared to fresh embryos, vitrified ones had a higher incidence of damage (propidium iodide-stained cells) irrespective of the vitrification method (P = 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF