Rhythm control versus rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Results of the HOT CAFE Polish Study.

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) can be managed either by maintaining sinus rhythm using antiarrhythmic drugs and/or electrical cardioversion, or by leaving patients in AF and controlling ventricular rate without attempts to restore sinus rhythm. Which of these two strategies is superior, has not yet been definitively established.

Aim: HOT CAFE Polish Study (How To Treat Chronic Atrial Fibrillation) was designed to evaluate in a randomised, multicentre and prospective manner the risks and advantages of two therapeutical strategies - rate control or rhythm control, in patients with persistent AF.

[Role amiodarone in sinus rhythm maintenance after successful cardioversion in patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation].

Unlabelled: Antiarrhythmic drugs prophylaxis may improve late outcome of electrical cardioversion (CV) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We conducted a prospective study of the efficacy of sequential antiarrhythmic drug therapy in sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance after a successful elective CV in patients (pts) with persistent nonvalvular AF. Investigated group and methods.