Methods for the assessment of gastric emptying in critically ill, enterally fed adults.

Critically ill patients may experience delayed gastric emptying. Patients receiving enteral feeding are monitored closely to detect a delay of gastric emptying, assess feeding tolerance, and prevent aspiration pneumonia. The most common practice for assessing gastric emptying is to measure the aspirated gastric residual volume; however, this is an unreliable method that lacks standardization, fails to differentiate normal digestive secretions from enteral formula, and results in unnecessary interruptions of enteral nutrition.

Enteral glutamine during active shock resuscitation is safe and enhances tolerance of enteral feeding.

Background: Feeding the hemodynamically unstable patient is increasingly practiced, yet few data exist on its safety. Because enteral glutamine is protective to the gut in experimental models of shock and improves clinical outcomes, it may benefit trauma patients undergoing shock resuscitation and improve tolerance if administered early. This pilot study aimed to evaluate gastrointestinal tolerance and safety of enteral feeding with glutamine, beginning during shock resuscitation in severely injured patients.

Gastric feeding as an extension of an established enteral nutrition protocol.

Background: Indiscriminate gastric feeding in ICU patients imposes unacceptable risks of aspiration. Believing that a subset of ICU patients can be fed safely via the stomach, we have developed a protocol to identify appropriate patients and guide the bedside clinician in how to safely and effectively feed via the stomach.

Methods: A literature search was done to identify appropriate medical literature.

Postinjury enteral tolerance is reliably achieved by a standardized protocol.

Background: Postinjury enteral nutrition (EN) is beneficial. Unfortunately, severely injured patients who should benefit most are frequently intolerant. To assist in maximizing enteral tolerance in the critically injured, we first implemented a prospective analysis of the effectiveness of a standardized enteral protocol (EP) at a single institution followed by a prospective multi-institutional analysis of its implementation.