Objectives: Cervical cancer is on the rise in Canada. Addressing patient anxiety and improving patient understanding of colposcopy and results may improve adherence. This randomized controlled trial examined the impact of colposcopy results delivery by a Nurse Liaison versus the referring primary care provider (PCP) on patient anxiety, and secondary outcomes including patient satisfaction, knowledge of diagnosis, and 9-month adherence to follow-up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: A randomized non-inferiority trial showed worse survival in women with early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy by minimally invasive approach compared to laparotomy; the impact of surgical approach on survival following radical trachelectomy is unknown.
Objective: To examine oncologic outcomes in women with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent robotic or vaginal radical trachelectomy at Canadian cancer centers with the highest volumes of radical trachelectomy procedures.
Study Design: Retrospective multi-centre cohort analysis which includes patients who had surgery between 2006 and 2019.
Background: Shifting from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening will initially increase colposcopy referrals. The anticipated impact on health systems has been raised as a concern for implementation. It is unclear if the higher rate of colposcopy referrals is sustained after initial HPV-based screens or reverts to new lower baselines due to earlier detection and treatment of precancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis study examined invasive cervical cancer (ICC) incidence trends in British Columbia (BC) by age and stage-at-diagnosis relative to World Health Organization ICC elimination targets (4 per 100,000 persons). Incident ICC cases (1971-2017) were obtained from the BC Cancer Registry. Annual age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) per 100,000 persons were generated using the direct method.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Several co-factors for HPV oncogenesis have been proposed, including co-infection with HSV-2. We assessed the relationship between HSV-2 infection and HPV-related outcomes in quadrivalent HPV-vaccinated (qHPV) women living with HIV (WLWH).
Methods: In this multi-site study of immunogenicity and efficacy of the qHPV vaccine in WLWH, visits took place at months -3, 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and annually thereafter.
Background: Women living with HIV (WLWH) experience higher rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer than women without HIV. Changes in the vaginal microbiome have been implicated in HPV-related disease processes such as persistence of high-risk HPV infection but this has not been well defined in a population living with HIV.
Methods: Four hundred and 20 girls and WLWH, age ≥9, across 14 clinical sites in Canada were enrolled to receive three doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine for assessment of vaccine immunogenicity.
Self-collection may provide an opportunity for innovation within population-based human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer screening programs by providing an alternative form of engagement for all individuals. The primary objective was to determine willingness to self-collect a vaginal sample for primary HPV screening and factors that impact willingness in individuals who participated in the Human Papillomavirus For Cervical Cancer (HPV FOCAL) screening trial, a large randomized controlled cervical screening trial. A cross-sectional online survey was distributed between 2017 and 2018 to 13,176 eligible participants exiting the FOCAL trial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWhile cervix screening using cytology is recommended at 2- to 3-year intervals, given the increased sensitivity of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening to detect precancer, HPV-based screening is recommended every 4- to 5-years. As organized cervix screening programs transition from cytology to HPV-based screening with extended intervals, there is some concern that cancers will be missed between screens. Participants in HPV FOr CervicAL Cancer (HPV FOCAL) trial received cytology (Cytology Arm) at 24-month intervals or HPV-based screening (HPV Arm) at 48-month intervals; both arms received co-testing (cytology and HPV testing) at exit.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To study participant's acceptability of and attitudes towards human papillomavirus (HPV) testing compared with cytology for cervical cancer screening and what impact having an HPV positive result may have in future acceptability of screening.
Design: Cross-sectional online survey of clinical trial participants.
Setting: Primary care, population-based Cervix Screening Program, British Columbia, Canada.
The Human Papillomavirus FOr CervicAL cancer (HPV FOCAL) trial is a large randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of primary HPV testing to cytology among women in the population-based Cervix Screening Program in British Columbia, Canada. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the HPV FOCAL trial to estimate the incremental cost per detected high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse lesions (CIN2+). A total of 19,009 women aged 25 to 65 were randomized to one of two study groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSince 2008, girls in British Columbia (BC), Canada, have been offered HPV vaccination through a school-based, publicly funded immunization program. The oldest birth cohort eligible for the vaccination program was born in 1994 and uptake is on average 63%. To evaluate the impact of the HPV vaccine in BC, ecological trends in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) rates were assessed in young women before and after the implementation of the HPV vaccination program.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Long-term safety of a single negative human papillomavirus (HPV) test for cervical cancer screening is unclear. The HPV FOr cerviCAL Cancer Trial (FOCAL) was a randomized trial comparing HPV testing with cytology. The FOCAL-DECADE cohort tracked women who received one HPV test during FOCAL, and were HPV negative, for up to 10 years to identify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) detected through a provincial screening program.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To describe prevalent and persistent oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types detected in women living with HIV (WLWH) in Canada, including women with cervical dyskaryosis, and to determine predictors of type-specific HPV persistence.
Methods: Women and girls living with HIV, recruited from 14 sites of HIV care across Canada, were included in a sub-analysis of a prospective vaccine immunogenicity cohort study (two HPV DNA results, at least one cervical cytology result pre-vaccination). Demographic and clinical data were collected alongside cervical samples for cytology and HPV DNA typing between November 25, 2008, and May 19, 2015.
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have promising safety and immunogenicity data in women living with HIV (WLWH). However, it is critical to understand the residual burden of oncogenic HPV within WLWH to inform postvaccination cervical screening needs. We assessed rates of persistent infection with nonquadrivalent HPV (qHPV) oncogenic types in a cohort of qHPV-vaccinated WLWH.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: The primary obkective was to determine the prevalence of (a) a positive anal cancer screen and (b) histological anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in women undergoing surveillance for previously diagnosed and treated human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated vulvar HSIL. The secondary objective was to determine the patients' acceptability of the screen.
Materials And Methods: This is a single-institution, cross-sectional pilot study.
HPV FOCAL is a randomized control trial of cervical cancer screening. The intervention arm received baseline screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) and the control arm received liquid-based cytology (LBC) at baseline and 24 months. Both arms received 48-month exit HPV and LBC cotesting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn the context of changing recommendations for cervical cancer screening, differing recommendations in each province, and a lack of guidance for cervical screening of immunocompromised women, this article provides specific recommendations for cervical cancer screening of immunocompromised women in Canada.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: This study seeks to identify barriers to colposcopy examination faced by patients living in Northern BC to improve outcomes for women at risk of developing cervical cancer.
Methods: A retrospective chart review (n = 309) was conducted in the four colposcopy clinics in Northern BC to collect information regarding patients who were referred for colposcopy after abnormal cytology. Demographic factors associated with non-attendance were identified as barriers to accessing care.
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is safe and efficacious in women without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although good immunogenicity has been observed in women living with HIV (WLWH), efficacy data in this population are needed.
Methods: We enrolled 420 females aged ≥9 years (range, 9-65) living with HIV.
Importance: There is limited information about the relative effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone compared with cytology in North American populations.
Objective: To evaluate histologically confirmed cumulative incident cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) detected up to and including 48 months by primary HPV testing alone (intervention) or liquid-based cytology (control).
Design, Setting, And Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted in an organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Canada.
Objective: The aim of the study was to determine regression rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 in women younger than 24 years, followed conservatively for up to 24 months.
Materials And Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of colposcopy patients in clinic database based on the following: (1) younger than 24 years at first visit; (2) first visit January 1, 2010, to May 31, 2013, and at least 1 follow-up visit after diagnosis; (3) histologic diagnosis of CIN2+; and (4) optimal conservative management (observation for up to 24 months or to 24 years, whichever occurred first). Patient information and clinical/pathologic data were extracted from charts to examine patient characteristics and treatment outcomes, CIN2+ regression rates, median times to regression for CIN2 versus CIN3 (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis), and predictors of regression (multivariate logistic regression analysis).
Objectives: To determine whether Hybrid Capture 2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test (HC2) can be used as a test of cure in women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN 2+) and allow discharge from colposcopy follow-up with a return to a cytology-based screening program for HC2-negative women.
Materials And Methods: Data were analyzed for all women who underwent a loop electrosurgical excision procedure between August 1, 2008, and June 30, 2011, and had a valid HC2 result after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and follow-up histopathology result, to determine risk of persistent or recurrent CIN 2+ in HC2-positive and HC2-negative women.
Results: Two thousand three hundred forty women had adequate biopsies and valid HC2 results.
Current diagnostic capabilities and limitations of fluorescence endomicroscopy in the cervix are assessed by qualitative and quantitative image analysis. Four cervical tissue types are investigated: normal columnar epithelium, normal and precancerous squamous epithelium, and stromal tissue. This study focuses on the perceived variability within and the subtle differences between the four tissue groups in the context of endomicroscopic in vivo pathology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The HPV FOCAL Trial is a RCT comparing human papilloma virus (HPV) with Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) screening for cervical cancer. Results are presented for the comparison of the Safety and Control arms after two rounds.
Methods: HPV FOCAL included randomisation of women aged 25-65 into the Safety arm, where they were initially screened with HPV and the Control arm, where they received entry screening with LBC, with both arms screened again with LBC at 24 months.