EMA commentary on the guideline on quality, nonclinical and clinical aspects of medicinal products containing genetically modified cells.

Great advances have been made in the knowledge of development and regulatory approval of medicinal product containing genetically modified cells. Although a guideline has been available in the EU since 2012, the current updated version provides a useful guide to developers and professionals involved in the regulatory process of these medicines. This article presents the main issues communicated in that guidance, the regulators' insights and a commentary from the academic developers' point of view.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Products in Spain (2004-2022): Experience and Challenges for the Future.

Clinical investigation is the basis for establishing how useful advanced therapy investigational medicinal products (ATiMP) are for the treatment of serious diseases.In Spain, clinical trials (CT) on ATiMP need to follow the general European legislation on CT with medicinal products plus some specific legislation and guidance depending on the type of ATiMP.This chapter describes the characteristics of CT on ATiMP authorized in Spain in the period 2004-2022 and the legislation applicable along this period.

Marketing Regulatory Oversight of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Europe.

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) in the European Union (EU) are regulated by Regulation 1394/2007 and comprise gene and cell therapy and tissue-engineered products. Under this framework, ATMP are authorised by the centralised procedure, coordinated by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), whereas clinical trial authorisations remain at the remit of each National Competent Authority. The Committee for Advanced Therapies is responsible for the scientific evaluation of the marketing authorisation applications and for generating a draft opinion that goes to the Committee for Human Medicinal Products for a final opinion.

The harmonization of World Health Organization International Nonproprietary Names definitions for cell and cell-based gene therapy substances: when a name is not enough.

The World Health Organization (WHO) assigns International Nonproprietary Names (INN) to pharmaceutical substances, including advanced therapy medicinal products, to ensure that each substance is globally recognized by a unique name. The majority of INN are published in the WHO Drug Information in accordance with the nomenclature rules of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. However, advanced therapy medicinal products, and in particular cell therapy and cell-based gene therapy substances, cannot be defined by such chemical nomenclature.

Manufacturing, characterization and control of cell-based medicinal products: challenging paradigms toward commercial use.

During the past decade, a large number of cell-based medicinal products have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of various diseases and tissue defects. However, licensed products and those approaching marketing authorization are still few. One major area of challenge is the manufacturing and quality development of these complex products, for which significant manipulation of cells might be required.

Challenges with advanced therapy medicinal products and how to meet them.

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), which include gene therapy medicinal products, somatic cell therapy medicinal products and tissue-engineered products, are at the cutting edge of innovation and offer a major hope for various diseases for which there are limited or no therapeutic options. They have therefore been subject to considerable interest and debate. Following the European regulation on ATMPs, a consolidated regulatory framework for these innovative medicines has recently been established.

Leishmania infection: laboratory diagnosing in the absence of a "gold standard".

There is no gold standard for diagnosing leishmaniases. Our aim was to assess the operative validity of tests used in detecting Leishmania infection using samples from experimental infections, a reliable equivalent to the classic definition of gold standard. Without statistical differences, the highest sensitivity was achieved by protein A (ProtA), immunoglobulin (Ig)G2, indirect fluorescenece antibody test (IFAT), lymphocyte proliferation assay, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction of bone marrow (qPCR-BM), qPCR-Blood, and IgG; and the highest specificity by IgG1, IgM, IgA, qPCR-Blood, IgG, IgG2, and qPCR-BM.

Vaccination with plasmid DNA encoding KMPII, TRYP, LACK and GP63 does not protect dogs against Leishmania infantum experimental challenge.

Vaccination of dogs, the domestic reservoir of Leishmania infantum, is the best method for controlling zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. This strategy would reduce the incidence of disease in both the canine and, indirectly, the human population. Different vaccination approaches have been investigated against canine leishmaniasis (CaL) but to date there is only one licensed vaccine against this disease in dogs, in Brazil.

A long term experimental study of canine visceral leishmaniasis.

Previous studies on Leishmania infantum and the canine immune response are derived mainly from short-term studies. To date, there have been no longitudinal studies that perform a serial analysis of the intensity of infection in conjunction with immunological parameters and clinical signs in Leishmania-infected dogs. For this purpose, six dogs were infected experimentally by the i.