Contraceptive efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system for up to 8 years: findings from the Mirena Extension Trial.

Background: The 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is an established, long-acting contraceptive option with approved use for up to 7 years.

Objective: The Mirena Extension Trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system during extended use beyond 5 and up to 8 years.

Study Design: This was a multicenter, single-arm study in the United States, enrolling existing users of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, aged 18 to 35 years, who have had the system for 4.

Real world data on symptomology and diagnostic approaches of 27,840 women living with endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a chronic disease that requires a suitable, lifelong treatment. To our knowledge, the Visanne Post-approval Observational Study (VIPOS) is to date the largest real-world, non-interventional study investigating hormonal management of endometriosis. We describe women's experiences of endometriosis in the real world by considering their symptoms and the diagnostic process in their healthcare setting.

Comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems and levonorgestrel-containing contraceptives with oral or subdermal administration route.

Objective: To compare systemic exposure to levonorgestrel (LNG) released from commercially available intrauterine systems (IUSs), a subdermal implant, and oral contraceptives.

Methods: An integrated population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis of data from over 3400 individuals in ten clinical studies with six different LNG-releasing contraceptives (four long-acting reversible contraceptives [LARCs: LNG-IUS 8, 12, and 20, initially releasing LNG 14, 17.5, and 20 μg/day, a subdermal implant initially releasing LNG 100 μg/day according to label]; progestin-only pill [POP: LNG 30 μg/day]; and combined oral contraceptive [COC] pill [LNG 100 μg/day and ethinylestradiol 20 μg/day]), was conducted to generate a popPK model.

Overcoming barriers to levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system placement: an evaluation of placement of LNG-IUS 8 using the modified EvoInserter® in a majority nulliparous population.

Objectives: To report placement success rate, and ease and pain associated with placement, of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 8 using the modified EvoInserter® placement device.

Study Design: This was a pooled analysis using data from three previously reported Phase III studies in nulliparous (83.3%) or parous (16.

Continuation rates, bleeding profile acceptability, and satisfaction of women using an oral contraceptive pill containing estradiol valerate and dienogest versus a progestogen-only pill after switching from an ethinylestradiol-containing pill in a real-life setting: results of the CONTENT study.

Background: Oral contraceptives are still associated with high discontinuation rates, despite their efficacy. There is a wide choice of oral contraceptives available, and the aim of this study was to assess continuation rates, bleeding profile acceptability, and the satisfaction of women in the first year of using a contraceptive pill containing estradiol valerate and dienogest (EV/DNG) versus a progestogen-only pill (POP) in a real-life setting after discontinuing an ethinylestradiol-containing pill.

Methods And Results: In this prospective, noninterventional, observational study, 3,152 patients were included for the efficacy analyses (n=2,558 women in the EV/DNG group and n=592 in the POP group (two patients fulfilled the criteria of the efficacy population, but the used product was not known).

Noncontraceptive benefits of the estradiol valerate/dienogest combined oral contraceptive: a review of the literature.

Combined oral contraceptives formulated to include estradiol (E2) have recently become available for the indication of pregnancy prevention. A combined estradiol valerate and dienogest pill (E2V/DNG), designed to be administered using an estrogen step-down and a progestin step-up regimen over 26 days of active treatment followed by 2 days of placebo (26/2-day regimen), has also undergone research to assess the potential for additional noncontraceptive benefits. Randomized, placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that E2V/DNG is an effective treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding - a reduction in median menstrual blood loss approaching 90% occurs after 6 months of treatment.

Estradiol valerate plus dienogest versus ethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.

Objective: To demonstrate the superiority of estradiol valerate plus dienogest (E(2)V/DNG) over ethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel (EE/LNG) in reducing the number of days with dysmenorrheic pain among women with primary dysmenorrhea.

Methods: In a phase IIIb trial conducted at 44 centers worldwide between April 2009 and November 2010, otherwise healthy women aged 14-50 years requesting contraception were randomized to daily oral administration of E(2)V/DNG (n = 253) or EE/LNG (n = 254) for three 28-daycycles. The primary efficacy variable was number of days with dysmenorrheic pain, the category of which (none, mild, moderate, severe) was self-assessed on a daily basis (irrespective of menstrual bleeding status) and recorded on diary cards.

Change to either a nonandrogenic or androgenic progestin-containing oral contraceptive preparation is associated with improved sexual function in women with oral contraceptive-associated sexual dysfunction.

Introduction: It is a commonly held belief that combined oral contraceptive (COC) pills containing an androgenic progestin may be less likely to impair sexual function than COCs containing an anti-androgenic progestin.

Aim: The study aims to compare the effects of a COC containing a progestin with an anti-androgenic profile (estradiol valerate [E2 V]/dienogest [DNG]) to that of one with an androgenic progestin (ethinyl estradiol [EE]/levonorgestrel [LNG]) on sexual function in women with COC-associated sexual dysfunction.

Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, women with COC-associated female sexual dysfunction (FSD) were randomized to E2 V/DNG or EE/LNG for six cycles.

Efficacy and bleeding profile of a combined oral contraceptive containing oestradiol valerate/dienogest: a pooled analysis of three studies conducted in North America and Europe.

Objective: To summarise all clinical data on the contraceptive efficacy and bleeding profile associated with an oestradiol valerate (E2V) and dienogest (DNG) [E2V/DNG] combined oral contraceptive (COC) derived from Phase III trials.

Methods: Pooled analysis of three large-scale multicentre trials conducted in healthy women who received oral E2V/DNG for 7 to 28 cycles (28-day cycles).

Results: A total of 2266 women were included in this analysis.

Hormone withdrawal-associated symptoms: comparison of oestradiol valerate/dienogest versus ethinylestradiol/norgestimate.

Objectives: To determine the effect of oestradiol valerate/dienogest (E2V/DNG) versus ethinylestradiol/norgestimate (EE/NGM) on hormone-withdrawal associated symptoms (HWAS) in otherwise healthy women who had experienced at least one of these symptoms when using 21/7-day combined oral contraceptives (COCs).

Methods: This phase III, parallel-group study randomised 409 women aged 18 to 50 years to E2V/DNG or EE/NGM. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to cycle 6 in the average of the three highest visual analogue scale values for headache and/or pelvic pain during cycle days 22 to 28.

Improving the objective quality of large-scale clinical trials for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: experience from 2 multi-center, randomized trials.

This study demonstrates a robust and thorough trial design leading to accurate and objective data collection. We recommend that future studies investigating heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) should follow, and improve upon, this rigorous approach to menstrual trial data collection, not only to validate clinical results but also to improve the techniques used to acquire these results. We propose that the state-of-the-art methodology described here be used as the basis for new guidelines for the implementation of clinical trials in the area of HMB.

Pituitary, ovarian and additional contraceptive effects of an estradiol-based combined oral contraceptive: results of a randomized, open-label study.

Background: The estrogen step-down/progestogen step-up 28-day estradiol valerate/dienogest (E(2)V/DNG) oral contraceptive effectively inhibits ovulation; however, limited data are available regarding its effects on estradiol (E2), progesterone, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or its additional extraovarian contraceptive effects.

Study Design: In this secondary analysis, 100 women received E(2)V 3 mg on days 1-2, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg on days 3-7, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg on days 8-24, E(2)V 1 mg on days 25-26 and placebo on days 27-28 for one treatment cycle. Measures included the presence/absence of cervical mucus; endometrial thickness; and serum E2, progesterone, and gonadotropin levels.

Normalization of blood loss in women with heavy menstrual bleeding treated with an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate/dienogest.

Background: The study was conducted to assess the efficacy of estradiol valerate/dienogest (E₂V/DNG) administered using an estrogen step-down and progestogen step-up approach in a 28-day regimen in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) using clinical end points allowing E₂V/DNG to be compared with other available medical therapies.

Study Design: This was a pooled analysis of data from two identically designed randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple center studies conducted in Europe, Australia and North America that assessed the effectiveness of E₂V/DNG in reducing menstrual blood loss (MBL) in women with HMB. Women aged ≥ 18 years with objectively confirmed HMB were randomized to E₂V/DNG (n=220) or placebo (n=135) for seven treatment cycles.

Effective treatment of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding without organic cause: pooled analysis of two multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of oestradiol valerate and dienogest.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of oestradiol valerate/dienogest (E2V/DNG) for the treatment of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding without organic pathology based on the analysis of data from two identically designed double-blind, randomised studies.

Methods: Women aged ≥ 18 years with heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding were randomised to E2V/DNG (n = 269) or placebo (n = 152) for 196 days. Objective changes in menstrual blood loss (MBL) volume were assessed using the alkaline haematin method.

Metabolic and haemostatic effects of estradiol valerate/dienogest, a novel oral contraceptive: a randomized, open-label, single-centre study.

Background And Objective: The hormonal components of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have various metabolic and haemostatic effects. The objective of this study was to compare the metabolic and haemostatic effects of a novel COC comprising estradiol valerate/dienogest (E(2)V/DNG) with ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (EE/LNG).

Methods: In a randomized, open-label study conducted in Germany over seven cycles, healthy women aged 18-50 years received E(2)V/DNG (E(2)V 3 mg on days 1-2, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg on days 3-7, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg on days 8-24, E(2)V 1 mg on days 25-26, placebo on days 27-28; n = 30) or EE/LNG (EE 0.

Hemostatic effects of a novel estradiol-based oral contraceptive: an open-label, randomized, crossover study of estradiol valerate/dienogest versus ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel.

Background: A novel estradiol-based combined oral contraceptive (COC) is currently available in many countries worldwide, including Europe and the US. Based on previous studies, it is expected that this estradiol-based COC will have a reduced hepatic effect compared with COCs containing ethinylestradiol with regard to proteins controlling the hemostatic balance.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the hemostatic effects of the estradiol valerate/dienogest COC with a monophasic low-estrogen dose COC containing ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel.

Endometrial safety of an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest.

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the endometrial safety of an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate/dienogest (E(2)V/DNG) administered as an estrogen step-down and progestogen step-up regimen in women of reproductive age (18-50 years), using histological assessment of endometrial biopsy samples.

Methods: Endometrial biopsies were taken in a subset of healthy women who took part in a multicenter, open-label, noncomparative study assessing the contraceptive efficacy and safety of an E(2)V/DNG oral contraceptive. In each 28-day cycle, women received E(2)V 3 mg on days 1-2, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg on days 3-7, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg on days 8-24, E(2)V 1 mg on days 25-26, and placebo on days 27-28.