Publications by authors named "Marc-Andre Goulet"

The Same-Different task presents two stimuli in close succession and participants must indicate whether they are completely identical or if there are any attributes that differ. While the task is simple, its results have proven difficult to explain. Notably, response times are characterized by a effect whereby responses are faster than responses even though identical stimuli should be exhaustively processed to be accurate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of depression, anxiety, insomnia, PTSD, and Psychological distress (PD) related to COVID-19 among affected populations.

Methods: We searched articles in Medline, Embase, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science. Random-effects meta-analyses on the proportions of individuals with symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, PTSD, and PD were generated and between-group differences for gender, healthcare workers (HCWs), and regions where studies were conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

When asked to compare two stimuli, participants are on average faster to respond Same than Different, an effect coined the fast-same. The dual-process theory argues that information about similarity is processed in priority over any other type of information, causing the fast-same effect. We tested this serial architecture of cognitive processes using a double factorial paradigm, suitable for a Systems Factorial Technology (SFT) analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Participants are faster to decide that two stimuli are identical than to decide that they are different. Opposing theories suggested that this fast-same effect is either due (a) to a response bias toward similarity or (b) to facilitation caused by the repetition of the stimuli attributes. Although both theories predict the fast-same effect in a conventional same-different task, they make distinct predictions for tasks in which response bias is removed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Participants tend to match identical pairs of stimuli faster than different pairs. Despite many endeavours to explain this fast-same effect, there is still no theoretical consensus. A potential reason for the lack of consensus is that the cognitive architecture and capacity underlying such phenomenon is assumed and not formally tested.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There have been many empirical endeavors to explain the fact that participants correctly identify stimuli faster than stimuli. Despite a large body of literature, a conclusive and unanimous consensus to explain this effect is lacking. The present study offers a new perspective on the task using best-fitting parametric values of 2 sequential sampling models (linear ballistic accumulator [LBA] and drift-diffusion model [DDM]) to evaluate the contribution of 3 theoretical concepts (starting point, accumulation rate, and base time) to the fast-same effect.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigated how participants' eye movements change when identifying upright and inverted faces based on two types of information: configural (relationship between features) and featural (specific features).
  • - Two experiments were conducted—one where participants were unaware of the type of information relevant to the task, and another where they were informed— to see how prior knowledge affected their eye movement patterns.
  • - Results showed that eye scanning patterns differ based on task demands; without prior knowledge, participants focused on the eyes, while with prior knowledge of relational information, they looked more at the center of the face.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF