Direct vs. Indirect Digital Implant Impressions: A Time and Cost Analysis.

Background/objectives: This study aimed to compare the cost and time implications for implant-supported prosthesis comparing three digital impression techniques: digitization with an intraoral scanner, digitization of the conventional impression (without dental casts) and digitization of the stone models.

Methods: To assess the time and cost of digital impression techniques on implants, time records on intraoral scans were consulted and three models were created with one, two and six implants to assess extraoral procedures time. Costs were evaluated based on material consumption, time expenditure and operator-related expenses.

Accuracy of occlusal splints printed in different orientations by liquid crystal display technology: an in vitro study.

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of occlusal splints printed in different orientations by liquid crystal display technology.

Methods: An occlusal splint was digitally designed, and additively manufactured using an LCD printer (Phrozen Sonic 4k, Phrozen) at three orientations relative to the printer building plate: 0, 45, and 70 degrees (n=10). The 3D-printed occlusal splints were digitised using a desktop scanner, resulting in experimental meshes.

Trueness of Extraoral Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant Impressions-In Vitro Study.

Direct scanning of silicone impressions is a valid technique. However, studies in implant-supported rehabilitations are lacking. This in vitro study aims to compare the trueness of impressions obtained with two types of silicone and their corresponding stone casts, using two laboratory scanners in a full-arch implant rehabilitation.