Speech intelligibility declines with age and sensorineural hearing damage (SNHL). However, it remains unclear whether cochlear synaptopathy (CS), a recently discovered form of SNHL, significantly contributes to this issue. CS refers to damaged auditory-nerve synapses that innervate the inner hair cells and there is currently no go-to diagnostic test available.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe individual loudness perception of a patient plays an important role in hearing aid satisfaction and use in daily life. Hearing aid fitting and development might benefit from individualized loudness models (ILMs), enabling better adaptation of the processing to individual needs. The central question is whether additional parameters are required for ILMs beyond non-linear cochlear gain loss and linear attenuation common to existing loudness models for the hearing impaired (HI).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAuditory de-afferentation, a permanent reduction in the number of inner-hair-cells and auditory-nerve synapses due to cochlear damage or synaptopathy, can reliably be quantified using temporal bone histology and immunostaining. However, there is an urgent need for non-invasive markers of synaptopathy to study its perceptual consequences in live humans and to develop effective therapeutic interventions. While animal studies have identified candidate auditory-evoked-potential (AEP) markers for synaptopathy, their interpretation in humans has suffered from translational issues related to neural generator differences, unknown hearing-damage histopathologies or lack of measurement sensitivity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLoudness context effects comprise differences in judgments of the loudness of a target stimulus depending on the presence of a preceding inducer tone. Interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between inducer tone and target tone of about 200 ms and above cause an induced loudness reduction (ILR) of the target tone. As the ILR increases, respectively, the perceived loudness of the target stimuli decreases with increasing ISI.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA loudness model with a central gain is suggested to improve individualized predictions of loudness scaling data from normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. The current approach is based on the loudness model of Pieper [(2016). J.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLittle is known about how outer hair cell loss interacts with noise-induced and age-related auditory nerve degradation (i.e., cochlear synaptopathy) to affect auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave characteristics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe perception of loudness is strongly influenced by peripheral auditory processing, which calls for a physiologically correct peripheral auditory processing stage when constructing advanced loudness models. Most loudness models, however, rather follow a functional approach: a parallel auditory filter bank combined with a compression stage, followed by spectral and temporal integration. Such classical loudness models do not allow to directly link physiological measurements like otoacoustic emissions to properties of their auditory filterbank.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHearing impairment is characterized by two potentially coexisting sensorineural components: (i) cochlear gain loss that yields wider auditory filters, elevated hearing thresholds and compression loss, and (ii) cochlear neuropathy, a noise-induced component of hearing loss that may impact temporal coding fidelity of supra-threshold sound. This study uses a psychoacoustic amplitude modulation (AM) detection task in quiet and multiple noise backgrounds to test whether these aspects of hearing loss can be isolated in listeners with normal to mildly impaired hearing ability. Psychoacoustic results were compared to distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) thresholds and envelope-following response (EFR) measures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPeople with sensorineural hearing loss generally suffer from a reduced ability to understand speech in complex acoustic listening situations, particularly when background noise is present. In addition to the loss of audibility, a mixture of suprathreshold processing deficits is possibly involved, like altered basilar membrane compression and related changes, as well as a reduced ability of temporal coding. A series of 6 monaural psychoacoustic experiments at 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA model of the cochlea was used to bridge the gap between model approaches commonly used to investigate phenomena related to otoacoustic emissions and more filter-based model approaches often used in psychoacoustics. In the present study, a nonlinear and active one-dimensional transmission line model was developed that accounts for several aspects of physiological data with a single fixed parameter set. The model shows plausible excitation patterns and an input-output function similar to the linear-compressive-linear function as hypothesized in psychoacoustics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDetection thresholds for sinusoidal amplitude modulation at low levels are higher (worse) when the carrier of the signal falls in a region of high pure-tone sensitivity (a minimum of the fine structure of the threshold in quiet) than when it falls at a fine-structure maximum. This study explores possible mechanisms behind this phenomenon by measuring modulation detection thresholds as a function of modulation frequency (experiment 1) and of carrier level for tonal carriers (experiment 2) and for 32-Hz wide noise carriers (experiment 3). The carriers could either fall at a fine-structure minimum, a fine-structure maximum, or in a region without fine structure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFModulation detection thresholds of a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone were measured for two different positions of the low-level carrier relative to the fine structure of the threshold in quiet. Modulation detection thresholds were higher for a carrier at a fine-structure minimum than for a carrier at a fine-structure maximum, regardless of whether the carriers had the same sound pressure level or the same sensation level. This indicates that even for small variations of the carrier frequency, the sensitivity to amplitude modulation can vary substantially due to the frequency characteristics of the threshold in quiet.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAudiograms measured with a high frequency resolution often show quasi-periodic ripples of up to 15 dB in normal-hearing listeners. This fine structure of the threshold in quiet is commonly associated with the active processes in the cochlea. Therefore its absence is discussed in the literature as an indicator of cochlear vulnerability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTone complexes with positive (m+) and negative (m-) Schroeder phase show large differences in masking efficiency. This study investigated whether the different phase characteristics also affect loudness. Loudness matches between m+ and m- complexes were measured as a function of (1) the fundamental frequency (f0) for different frequency bands in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects, and (2) intensity level in normal-hearing subjects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis study investigates the acoustic reflex threshold (ART) dependency on stimulus phase utilizing low-level reflex audiometry [Neumann et al., Audiol. Neuro-Otol.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDistortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at 2f1-f2 (f2/f1 = 1.2) have two components from different cochlear sources, i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHearing thresholds measured with high-frequency resolution show a quasiperiodic change in level called threshold fine structure (or microstructure). The effect of this fine structure on loudness perception over a range of stimulus levels was investigated in 12 subjects. Three different approaches were used.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF