Objective: To investigate the fracture resistance and failure modalities of anterior endocrown restorations fabricated employing diverse ceramic materials, and bonded using various cementation methodologies.
Materials And Methods: Forty maxillary central incisors were divided into two main groups based on the ceramic materials used; GroupI (Zir): zirconia endocrwons (Zolid HT, Ceramill, Amanngirrbach) and GroupII (E-Max): e-max endocrowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent).
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of dynamic fatigue on fracture load and failure mode of different types of adhesive zirconia restorations.
Materials And Methods: Eighty adhesive cantilever fixed dental prostheses (CFDP) were fabricated and assigned to four equal groups (n = 20) using the following materials and techniques. Group 1: machine copy-milling zirconia (Cercon), group 2: manual copy-milling technique (ZirkonZahn), group 3: slip casting technique (Vita In-ceram Zirconia), group 4: metal-ceramic CFDP.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the retentive strength of single-unit crowns with 10 degrees and 26 degrees taper angles cemented using two surface conditioning methods.
Materials And Methods: Thirty-two freshly extracted sound human molars were divided into two groups (n = 16) and prepared in a standardized manner with 10 degrees and 26 degrees taper angles. All-ceramic (IPS e.
This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of galvano-ceramic crowns with metal-ceramic crowns cemented to natural premolar teeth with different luting cements. Sixty intact maxillary premolars were prepared to receive full-coverage crown restorations and were divided into 2 equal groups (n = 30): galvano-ceramic crowns and metal-ceramic crowns. Each group was further subdivided into 3 equal subgroups (n = 10) according to the luting cement used: zinc-phosphate, glass-ionomer, or adhesive-resin cement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF