Background: Studies have shown that the risk of new-onset heart failure (HF) is higher postimplantation for patients receiving right ventricular pacing.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate incidence, risk factors, and implications for long-term prognosis of new-onset HF in patients after pacemaker implantation.
Methods: Patients without pre-existing HF who received a pacemaker in Sweden during the period of 2005 to 2020 were identified via the nationwide Pacemaker Registry.
Background: Patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing are at an increased risk of heart failure. Previous studies have indicated that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is underused in this setting, and that there may be sex-based differences in both CRT use and clinical outcome.
Objective: To evaluate sex-based differences in CRT use and clinical outcome for patients with new-onset heart failure post RV pacing.
Background: Left ventricular (LV) lead position may be an important factor for delivering effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We therefore aimed to evaluate the effects of LV lead position, stratified by native QRS morphology, regarding the clinical outcome.
Methods: A total of 1295 CRT-implanted patients were retrospectively evaluated.
Background: Observational data suggest that an anterior or apical left ventricular (LV) position in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with worse outcome and higher likelihood of "nonresponse." It is not known whether the benefits of optimizing LV lead position in a second procedure outweighs the procedural risks.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of LV lead repositioning.
. This study assessed the management approach and outcome of the pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads malpositioned in the left heart. Malpositioned leads (MPLs) may have deleterious consequences, and appropriate management remains uncertain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMalpositioned pacemaker lead in the left ventricle (LV) is a rare procedural complication, which causes a special risk of thromboembolic events. Hence, prompt identification and early management of misplaced leads inside the LV is critical. Herein, we present a case of malpositioned pacemaker lead with transient ischemic attacks after the pacemaker implantation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF