Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the shaping ability of four root canal preparation systems in newly developed 3D-printed root canal models.
Materials And Methods: For this study, 1080 3D-printed acrylic resin blocks with nine different root canal configurations were produced. They were prepared with Reciproc R25 (#25), F6 SkyTaper (#25 and #30) F360 (#25 and #35) and One Shape (#25) (N = 30 per system).